Live data from Hacker News

AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

bbc.com

91–100 of 104 posts

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#91
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the second option. Should a party that promises to act extra-legally once they get into power be allowed to campaign? I think not, but it is not an easy question to answer. Europeans have been reminded of the dangers of right-wing populism with what's currently happening in America.

Oof. Not an easy question indeed. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy And yet... in the US at least, we have an avenue for that. Change the laws. The Constitution forbids what you want to do? You can change that, too. That's the route that you're supposed to take. If you won't, and you say so publicly , and the people are willing to vote for you a…

Note that in Germany, there are literally parts of of the constitution that are unchangeable, by design:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrenched_clause#Germany

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#92
post #90
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trump is complicated. He doesn't neatly fit into the boxes that our politicians usually fit in. He's neither fully right nor fully left. As I have said elsewhere, I think the left versus right wing distinction is no longer suitable for talking about the current political climate. The traditional politicians from both parties despise him. The Republican rank and file have only accepted him because of his massive popul…

> neither fully right nor fully left. There's a reason why fascists and Nazis broadly refer to themselves as the "third position".

What is the reason?

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#93
post #92
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> neither fully right nor fully left. There's a reason why fascists and Nazis broadly refer to themselves as the "third position".

What is the reason?

Because their ideology translates to a mix of traditionally left and traditionally right policies. Broadly speaking, it tends to be extreme right culturally and center-left economically.

Nazi Germany, for example, had quite a few explicitly socialist programs such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy.

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#94
post #93
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the reason?

Because their ideology translates to a mix of traditionally left and traditionally right policies. Broadly speaking, it tends to be extreme right culturally and center-left economically. Nazi Germany, for example, had quite a few explicitly socialist programs such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy .

Can you be more specific about the quote you used before?

Why do they call themselves "the third position"?

Just doing follow-ups to try to understand you.

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#95
post #94
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because their ideology translates to a mix of traditionally left and traditionally right policies. Broadly speaking, it tends to be extreme right culturally and center-left economically. Nazi Germany, for example, had quite a few explicitly socialist programs such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy .

Can you be more specific about the quote you used before? Why do they call themselves "the third position"? Just doing follow-ups to try to understand you.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to give a TL;DR lecture on history when there are good sources for that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#96
post #95
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you be more specific about the quote you used before? Why do they call themselves "the third position"? Just doing follow-ups to try to understand you.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to give a TL;DR lecture on history when there are good sources for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

What you said sounded like a bold claim. I just wanted to understand if you understand the implications of applying that label. I wanted to know if you understand the reason.

I'm not gonna blindly fight based on a vague idea that history is repeating itself. Or should I? (rethorical).

You seem like a very educated person with broad historical knowledge. Why use cheap accusations to put your ideas forward? (rethorical).

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#97
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Regarding the AfD, ‘Senior members have been disgraced for playing down Nazi war crimes and accepting suspicious payments from Russia and China. There were calls to ban the party when it was reported party members were at a meeting of neo-Nazis where a “master plan” to expel millions of people from Germany was discussed, including asylum seekers, foreigners with residency rights and “unassimilated citizens”. The AfD…

>accepting suspicious payments from Russia Do you really think the Russians would ever support a Neo Nazi party after what happened in WW2? That's propaganda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Utkin and the whole https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagner_Group. Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rusich_Group

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#98
post #95
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you be more specific about the quote you used before? Why do they call themselves "the third position"? Just doing follow-ups to try to understand you.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to give a TL;DR lecture on history when there are good sources for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

Thank you for that link. This was news to me and now I have a whole host of books to catch up on.

Re: AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence

#99
post #96
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to give a TL;DR lecture on history when there are good sources for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

What you said sounded like a bold claim. I just wanted to understand if you understand the implications of applying that label. I wanted to know if you understand the reason. I'm not gonna blindly fight based on a vague idea that history is repeating itself. Or should I? (rethorical). You seem like a very educated person with broad historical knowledge. Why use cheap accusations to put your ideas forward? (rethorical…

What is the bold claim? That fascists refer to themselves as "third position"? That's literally textbook history. Or that modern-day GOP, now fully taken over by the Christian nationalist wing, is also a "third position" party, and that is why their de facto platform (as evidenced by what they're literally doing right now) is the way it is? That's a simple observation.
Post reply on HN