Live data from Hacker News

The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

happiness.hks.harvard.edu

91–100 of 469 posts

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#91

I don't really get where people with kids found these 6.5 hrs / wk to spend on friendships, or even the quoted current averages of 4 hrs / wk. On a workday, there isn't much time. I roll out of bed at 6:30, get the kids up and fed breakfast and out the door. I finally get actually working at 8:30-9:30, depending on if I exercise or not. Stop work in the 5:30-6 range, switch into making dinner, getting kids to eat din…

Was having kids worth this in your opinion -- genuine question?

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#92

It's not lost, just no longer necessary for survival. Also, bad communities fail. They should be allowed to fail. Until recently, individuals needed to be part of some sort of kinship group to get their needs met and to survive. To communicate with anyone in near real time you had to be close by. We have managed to engineer a society where individuals can survive "on their own" - basically outside their kinship group…

> It's not lost, just no longer necessary for survival.

The psychological argument is that it is necessary for survival — that a society that has long taken underlying healthy behaviours for granted is discovering that it's losing what defines society itself.

Trust, cooperation, sustainable development, sound policy-making, education, child-care...

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#94
post #64
post #35

I'm not sure what caused this, but I think the expectations of modern friendship have become unrealistic. Maybe it's movies and TV, where a "close friend" is more or less a non judgemental therapist that will throw down in a fight for you. What is a close friend? Before we can start asking people if they have any we should probably agree on a definition. If you use the Hollywood standard, then probably none of us hav…

>> What is a close friend? Before we can start asking people if they have any we should probably agree on a definition. If you use the Hollywood standard, then probably none of us have close friends. I've come to this same conclusion, but rarely express it because it's possible I'm just different. And I'd even go one step further, I think what a lot of people say friendship is, isn't actually what human friendship is…

These don't represent real or Hollywood friendships at all.

> - Completely perfect and devoid of all realities of life

Friendships are relationships that stand the test of time and hardship. You work through problems, illnesses including mental health struggles, deaths, employment and money problems, family and relationship problems, legal problems, all sorts.

> - No jealousy, no competition, no negative feelings

There are obviously always mixed emotions, but generally you won't harbour serious ill will towards your friends. This is something you can work on, though, as jealousy and envy are personality traits that can be controlled. Healthy competition is a positive, though.

> - Timeless and immortal

Friendships change and sometimes have to be ended, even when you like the other person. I think this is quite common and almost a trope of Hollywood movies.

> - No effort involved

Short of family and maybe employment, friendships require the most work in life. This one is particularly baffling from a Hollywood perspective, as going a friend in need is like the all-time Hollywood trope.

> - Completely balanced and healthy for everybody at all times

Obviously this isn't true, but this isn't portrayed either. Flawed characters are the only compelling characters in Hollywood.

> - Able to talk about every topic

Again, changing the uncomfortable topic trope is an ultra-trope.

Your "realistic friendship" section fits acquaintances rather than friends.

>I think these unrealistic expectations undermine real-world friendships because they always fall short.

I think some self-reflection is in order here, as this is projection.

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#95

It's not lost, just no longer necessary for survival. Also, bad communities fail. They should be allowed to fail. Until recently, individuals needed to be part of some sort of kinship group to get their needs met and to survive. To communicate with anyone in near real time you had to be close by. We have managed to engineer a society where individuals can survive "on their own" - basically outside their kinship group…

How a child is supposed to survive "on their own" ? And why do you think this would even be a good thing ?

“On their own” is in air quotes because it’s a vast simplification.

In kinship group days, and especially before vaccines, children simply didn’t survive. They died by the millions.

Today, a child has a viable alternative to the abusive or neglectful kinship group. Very often it is The State, but still. An alternative!

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#96
post #7
post #5

It’s crazy out there for a 40yo. One thing I’m considering is that maybe it’s ok if friends don’t reciprocate. I think some people just have to be the inviters or relationships fall apart.

Yes here too, and I’m guilty of the focus on family over friends, but also my peers are too and it creates a bunch of people that used to be close that never really see each other because they prioritize their immediate family

Guilty? Your family is your priority. Your duties toward them come first.

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one should ask a suicidal person not to kill themselves. If you believe in autonomy, every human has the right to decide when and how to end their lives. Slavery denies human autonomy by taking all control away. Even when you think their decision is a bad one, it’s their life and their decision.

Asking isn’t forcing. And people who are suicidal are often in an unhealthy state of mind that doesn’t persist over an extended period of time. And we obviously place limits on autonomy in all sorts of ways.

I don’t make the distinction between asking and forcing. To me, you can ask why someone wants to die. But stopping them? Or asking them to stop? Eh, not up to me.

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#98

I don't really get where people with kids found these 6.5 hrs / wk to spend on friendships, or even the quoted current averages of 4 hrs / wk. On a workday, there isn't much time. I roll out of bed at 6:30, get the kids up and fed breakfast and out the door. I finally get actually working at 8:30-9:30, depending on if I exercise or not. Stop work in the 5:30-6 range, switch into making dinner, getting kids to eat din…

Where did you find the time to read HN and write this comment? It's about prioritization. (My priorities are pretty much the same as yours)

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#99
post #5

It’s crazy out there for a 40yo. One thing I’m considering is that maybe it’s ok if friends don’t reciprocate. I think some people just have to be the inviters or relationships fall apart.

Does this also apply to texting? (some people always have to text first, otherwise the other will never write again). Or is it just that the other doesn't want to be your friend?

Re: The Friendship Recession: The lost art of connecting

#100
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Redlining and white flight definitely happened. It also happened that cities stopped funding municipal pools and other services. Things like Elks Lodges went into long term decline when women and blacks had to be admitted.

I don't deny white flight and red-lining happened, continues in some places, and is horrible. I'm not convinced that's the sole or even primary reason for modern loneliness. > Things like Elks Lodges went into long term decline when women and blacks had to be admitted. People don't need institutionalized racism and misogyny to make friends. They already have a right to be racist and privately associate / not associat…

I think you don’t understand what happened. When the laws were changed and forced communities to allow blacks to use municipal pools and when places like Elks Lodges were forced to accept women and minorities white men abandoned these things. Cities stopped funding municipal pools and membership in clubs drastically declined. White men gutted the idea of communal activity in response to civil rights.
Post reply on HN