Amazon Submits Bid for TikTok with US Sale Deadline Nearing

Post by davorak » Thu, Apr 03, 2025, 7:32 PM UTC

9rx wrote: post #90

davorak wrote: post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

cma's question was to me, after my comment, not to you. You are inserting your interruption into that. You argued that cma's question had a very particular interruption, sort of speaking for them, let them speak for themselves, or at least I am not interested in dissecting their comment's meaning with you. edit or maybe a better way to put it is that I can not have a conversation with you when you seem to be trying t…

> cma's question was to me I clearly replied to your comment, not cma's. > You are inserting your interruption into that. There are no interruptions in a threaded discussion. cma can reply to your comment in parallel. I do appreciate you bringing your misunderstandings to light, though. > let them speak for themselves He can if he so wishes. > or at least I am not interested in dissecting their comment's meaning with…

Post by BryantD » Fri, Apr 04, 2025, 6:23 PM UTC

BryantD wrote: post #20

siliconc0w wrote: post #10

It's crazy to me that TikTok is still operating. A law was passed, the supreme court even weighed in, and a EO cannot undo that. The president has an obligation to faithfully execute the law.

The law provided for a a 90-day extension on the deadline at the President's discretion. However, the extension required certain things to be true (significant progress made on the divestiture, legally binding contracts in place, and so on) -- so I'd agree that this wasn't faithful execution of the law.