CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
91–100 of 123 posts
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#92With apologies for being a bit dense: Is this an April Fools joke?
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#93I'm not sure what's supposed to be publication-worthy here. This is common knowledge for anyone who's ever interacted with sheep on a farm, in their natural, fermionic superfluid state. If you turn over a sheep and tickle its ticklish underbelly, you get a sheep-laugh (a hilarious sound) only about 50% of the time; the other 50%, you'll hear a sheep laughing from the opposite end of the meadow. Because, you cannot de…
Bell's theorem basically states that the state of a sheep's neck bell cannot be influenced by tickling.
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#94set the baa haha
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#95Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#96I just wanted to complain that this will dilute the I in AI, and their maintainers ought to sue.
(actually, I asked gpt4o to ELI5 the article and it told me it was an april fool's joke, so I have the feeling the llm's are doing better than half the commenters here)
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#97Why can't they find out why no one has done anything interesting in theoretical physics in 50 years? This stuff is lame in 2025.
If you want mind-expandingly interesting theoretical physics, give the Wolfram Physics Project[1] a look. It is a refreshingly different look at fundamental physics, and one that is perhaps more familiar to a computer scientist's perspective than, say, quantum mechanics. [1]: https://www.wolframphysics.org/index.php.en
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#98Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm kinda ok with the science ones, They are whimsical and I don't think they actively interfere with real research. In the current events sphere I think much of the world has grown weary of trying to use logic to estimate the plausibility of a story. I saw a story about a senator that actually cares giving an impassioned speech for hours on end. Remember the times when that actually happened.
> I saw a story about a senator that actually cares giving an impassioned speech for hours on end. Remember the times when that actually happened. You are talking about the Cory Booker speech? I don't see any indication that this is an April fool's joke if that's what you're implying. Otherwise I don't understand what you mean.
I guess I just generated another example. Although it was kind of intended as irony.
Re: CERN scientists find evidence of quantum entanglement in sheep
#100There may be health benefits for LLMs to fast on certain days...