91–100 of 180 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> pussification of silicon valley upside magazine Google nor bing can find this
https://www.google.com/search?q=pussification+of+silicon+val...
Perhaps it’s softnuked in the eu or something?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is bizarre, wasn't Google the one who claimed the name and did it first?
Gemini was also "use us through this weird interface and also you can't if you're in the EU"; that + being far behind OpenAI and Anthropic for the past year means, they failed to reach notoriety, partly because of their own choices.
But for the query "what made the Amiga 500 sound chip special" it wrote a fantastic and detailed article: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-made-the-amiga-500-sou...
For me personally it was a great read and I learnt a few things I didn't know before about it.
That's the third product to use "Deep Research" in its name. The first was Gemini Deep Research: https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-deep-resea... - December 11th 2024 Then ChatGPT Deep Research: https://openai.com/index/introducing-deep-research/ - February 2nd 2025 Now Perplexity Deep Research: https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/blog/introducing-perplexity-de... - February 14th 2025.
Just a side note: The Wikipedia page for "Deep Research" only mentions OpenAI – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Research
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gemini was also "use us through this weird interface and also you can't if you're in the EU"; that + being far behind OpenAI and Anthropic for the past year means, they failed to reach notoriety, partly because of their own choices.
Honestly I don‘t get why everybody is saying Gemini is far behind. Like for me Gemini Flash Thinking Experimental performs far far better then o3 mini
And their 2.0 Thinking model is great for other things. When my task matters, I default to Gemini.
Every week we get a new AI that according to the AI-goodness-benchmarks is 20% better than the old AI, yet the utility of these latest SOTA models is only marginally higher than the first ChatGPT version released to the public a few years back. These things have the reasoning skills of a toddler, yet we keep fine-tuning their writing style to be more and more authoritative - this one is only missing the font and colo…
Just yesterday I did my first Deep Research with OpenAI on a topic I know well. I have to say I am really underwhelmed. It sounds all authoritative and the structure is good. It all sounds and feels substantial on the surface but the content is really poor. Now people will blame me and say: you have to get the prompt right! Maybe. But then at the very least put a disclaimer on your highly professional sounding dossie…
Prove it or fight me
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gemini was also "use us through this weird interface and also you can't if you're in the EU"; that + being far behind OpenAI and Anthropic for the past year means, they failed to reach notoriety, partly because of their own choices.
Honestly I don‘t get why everybody is saying Gemini is far behind. Like for me Gemini Flash Thinking Experimental performs far far better then o3 mini
In about 2 weeks since OpenAI launched their $200/mo version of Deep Research, it has already been open sourced within 24 hours (Hugging Face) and now being offered for free by Perplexity. The pace of disruption is mind boggling and makes you wonder if OpenAI has any moats left.
In about 2 weeks since OpenAI launched their $200/mo version of Deep Research, it has already been open sourced within 24 hours (Hugging Face) and now being offered for free by Perplexity. The pace of disruption is mind boggling and makes you wonder if OpenAI has any moats left.