Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What they don't do, is waste time walking around looking for spare money that has been dropped. Because that would almost certainly be a waste of time. Why is it usually a waste of time? Because people rarely lose multiple bills of money, and if they do, our vision system is well equipped to spot the other bills quickly. The opposite is often true with software in my experience. When there is a bug, it's often beca…
Again, if you see a bug, fix it. If you are already in a section of code, read through all of it. And heck, if you are not running late on anything, feel free to start trying to re-architect parts that you think are off. If I'm just caught by a strawman at the start of the essay, apologies on that. I legit don't know anyone that casually encourages bugs as long as you have features. Tolerances are a thing, but so is…
Re: You should write "without bugs"
#91It's not that I know people who casually encourage bugs, but I know plenty of people who don't habitually do the kind of thing you describe in your first paragraph.