Live data from Hacker News

Uncut Currency

usmint.gov

91–100 of 421 posts

Re: Uncut Currency

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is already big a deal to change the images on currency (no matter what country). Given the US dollar is viewed as somewhat of a standard, you can imagine that to change its size/shape would be quite difficult to generate enough political enthusiasm for.

The insistence on cotton paper money is part of the problem. Canada’s banknotes are all the same size but because they’re polymer, have a brail punch in them. Edit: not braille but a system of raised dots nonetheless: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/banknotes/audience-specific-reso...

I personally far prefer the cotton paper money over any polymer notes or coins and hope we keep using it despite any other potential changes to the sizes or designs or whatever.

Re: Uncut Currency

#93
post #85

Why is the US one of the few countries that can't keep a consistent design across their bills and still does not have a way for blind people to identify which note they have. They are all the same size and have no embossed markings.

LOL. The lack of a consistent design is a core accessibility feature. Most "blind" people have some amount of vision. So starting in 1997 they began adding the very large numerals on the back and visual inconsistencies to the front so you can tell them apart with limited sight. Have a look at the bills side by side and you can see how they vary the background gradients and layout for easier identification: https://ww…

The accessibility of USD notes is notoriously poor. EUR, AUD or CHF banknotes have a consistent visual theme, but each denomination is a different size, has a bright and distinct predominant colour and they've had tactile features for decades. Sure, they look like monopoly money, but that's a good thing.

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/visually/html/index.en.html

Re: Uncut Currency

#94
post #65
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it doesn't say what happens if you cut it. It does though? > Can I cut uncut currency sheets? What happens if the notes on my sheet were cut apart? > Because the individual notes on uncut currency sheets are legal tender, they may be cut apart and spent. Were you to do this, they would only be valued at their face value, even though you would have paid more than their cumulative value for the uncut currency sheet.

Interesting up to what section they can be cut out, can it just be the two serial numbers and the denomination? Then the back of the notes becomes just "In God We Trust"

In the case of damaged bills, if you have over half of it it is generally still considered legal tender and banks will accept it as-is. However if over 50% of the bill is damaged or missing, it has to be turned into the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which is basically the paper money half of the US Mint, and investigated/examined to determine if it is valid for replacement or reimbursement.

So I would assume as long as you have over half after cutting it, it would still be good, although businesses and banks can turn it down if they are unsure of it's legality or legitimacy, and not having a full serial number would likely get it rejected nearly everywhere.

Re: Uncut Currency

#96
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the video interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ1TIYxm1vM he never demonstrates how he tears them apart after mentioning that they're perforated. To me, it all looks like a 4x1 sheet of $2 bills that you can buy off the US mint. The video interview all sounds like a joke, and he says at some point "No, no it's all a joke". Unless it's a deposition, it's all based on trusting his character and given his lates…

Wait, what? You have doubts about Steve Wozniak's character? Anyone who knows Woz can assure you that he is quite a character!

and a laser safety officer

https://www.geekculture.com/mt2/archives/2018/02/wozs_laser_...

Re: Uncut Currency

#97

Why is the US one of the few countries that can't keep a consistent design across their bills and still does not have a way for blind people to identify which note they have. They are all the same size and have no embossed markings.

The US is so weird about its currency. The repeated attempts to get rid of the dollar bill (dollar coins, two-dollar bill, etc.) have all "failed". I put "failed" in quotes, because all it requires is for the government to do it. Take the one-dollar bills out of circulation, no discussion, done. At this point, take the two-dollar bills (no one will notice) and the penny as well.

The metal producers for those pennies cry foul at the US gov't taking away jobs!

Re: Uncut Currency

#98
post #75
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US has last partially defaulted on its currency in 1971, surely a change of the design is possible too.

1971 wasn't such a big deal. Between the 1930s and 1971 only foreign central banks could redeem their dollars in gold. So I would put the 'partial default' in 1933, if you care about gold. But they had suspended convertibility of dollars into gold every so often before that. (And, of course, the dollar wasn't always about gold. They also experimented with silver and bimetalism.)

> But they had suspended convertibility of dollars into gold every so often before that.

They suspended redemptions of the certificated amount. You could not own gold until 1933 from 1974, but excluding of that, you can always convert your money into gold outside of the government if you want.

Re: Uncut Currency

#99
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's instagram. Slight tangent: the YouTube comments used to be famous for being a vile cesspit. Then Google changed something, and now they are full of positivity. Often too full.

And for songs, often (fake?) testimonies to people's emotional attachments to the song.

It's not just me / the music videos I look up then, is it? I can't help but wonder if it's some kind of YT hive mind, bots, or Google's own algorithms pushing those comments to the top.

Re: Uncut Currency

#100
post #45

Why is the US one of the few countries that can't keep a consistent design across their bills and still does not have a way for blind people to identify which note they have. They are all the same size and have no embossed markings.

The thing I cannot fathom is why quarters are so huge, considering they’re nearly valueless. Then you need whole stacks of $1 bills to pay anything relevant. I find both constantly cluttering up my wallet.

Nah, you need a credit card to pay anything relevant, and have done so for decades.
Post reply on HN