Earlier quoted context omitted.
I support this. It’s not possible to be “perfect,” but if we do our best to get there, we’ll make really good stuff. It’s unlikely to happen, though, as we have a system that explicitly rewards writing crap, because it makes money. As long as we fail to reward good work, we will continue to get poor work.
> As long as we fail to reward good work, we will continue to get poor work. I think that's a bit off. The problem is that we continue to reward poor work so the poor work continues.
Note that even my fairly mild statement was not received well. People really don't like discussion of improving the Quality of software, here. Too much money to be made in not-so-good stuff.