Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised I don't see it more. You can't impose a regulatory burden more troublesome than your traffic is worth
Sadly the EU doesn't really communicate this very well, and doesn't care to call out outright propaganda from ad tech and surveillance businesses, but the regulation is not actually hard to be compliant with. It literally just asks that you don't spy on people. That's it. Not spying on users? Great, you don't even have to do anything. I would be extremely surprised to see any attempt at enforcement against a website…
For example seemingly innocuous implementations like loading fonts directly off Google Fonts without consent (i.e. providing Google with information about visitors' browsing habits) would technically be on the wrong side of the GDPR, but I think it's very unlikely that anyone would complain about it, legally speaking.