Live data from Hacker News

Why Your Links Should Never Say “Click Here”

uxmovement.com

91–93 of 93 posts

Re: Why Your Links Should Never Say “Click Here”

#91
post #72
post #40

Without data it's hard to agree with these "conclusions" At very least if you are planning to change around your links based on this article give a look to Dustin Curtis' data-driven experiment on changing link names: www.dustincurtis.com/you_should_follow_me_on_twitter.html

Every idiot already copied Dustins conclusion and ignored his research. This article deserves an award for the most intelligent thoughtful accurate article that broke the web because its readers are idiots.

Not sure why you're getting downvoted, every time I see the obligatory "You should follow me on Twitter" at the end of every blog post or Dribbble submission, the last thing I want to do is follow that person on Twitter. Commanding someone to do something they might not have done otherwise is neither friendly nor approachable and I'm much more likely to click on the Follow button in the sidebar once I'm done reading a few of their entries and getting a more thorough idea of who this person is than the one at the bottom of a single post.

Re: Why Your Links Should Never Say “Click Here”

#92
post #8

Did the author A/B tested this?

Nope. Nothing on uxmovement is ever backed up by any data, just vague assertions. The worst part is that they always frame their articles as "why X is true", but then the article is essentially "x is true because x is true".

Wish this was its own comment and was upvoted to the top. I stopped going to UXMovement after the author continually attacked visitors in the comments section that questioned his posts to the point of calling them assholes and idiots. He seems to just post his own assertions about what UX is without any valuable data points.

Re: Why Your Links Should Never Say “Click Here”

#93

This is a fantastic article, and the first time I've ever come across anything addressing these issues. The only thing I don't entirely agree with is: 1) Wrong: "first Falling Bear gets run over " 2) Right: "first Falling Bear gets run over" I think they're just different. In the first case, I expect a link to to a photo of Falling Bear as he's getting run over. In the second case, I expect a link to a page on Fallin…

Exactly - I prefer links on the verbs when it comes to referencing individual events. Nouns should be used for more general information concerning the topic that isn't necessarily related to a particular incident/event.
Post reply on HN