https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim
https://github.com/olimorris/codecompanion.nvim
91–100 of 299 posts
https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim
https://github.com/olimorris/codecompanion.nvim
The main issue with these set of tools is that I mostly read and understand code more than writing it myself. Not enough attention is been given to this imbalance. It is impressive having an AI that can write code for you, but an AI that helps me understand which code we (as a team) should write would be much more useful.
I just want a fast programmable text editor with a native GUI and good defaults. But that seems really tough to find, for some reason. Zed is so close, but I’d much rather see a focus on the “programmable” part and let the AI and collaboration features emerge later out of rich extensibility (i.e. as plugins, perhaps even paid plugins) than have them built-in behind a sign-in and unknown future pricing model.
In the case of Zed it was always inevitable, a text editor doesn't raise >$10M in venture capital unless there's a plan to stuff it full of premium subscription features. Warp Terminal is a similar story, >$50M in funding for a terminal emulator of all things...
JetBrains ships a local, offline AI auto-complete in PyCharm. Sure it's limited, but it shows it can be done. It's a pity other companies aren't trying the same, especially this one that boasts about millisecond editing times. Edit: JetBrains, not IntelliJ. Auto-complete details - https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2024/04/04/full-line-code-co...
Zed will hook into ollama as well; so you can run your own locally; just not as part of the same process (yet?).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried it with C#. It's not comparable to Copilot. If I've never used Copilot I might be slightly impressed.
I don’t see programming getting exponentially harder. So eventually local compute will catch up with programming needs and offline AI will be pretty good.
I think the focus on speed is great, but I don't feel my IDE's speed has held me back in a decade.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems like a non-sequitur? Why does LLM integration mean that Zed is less good of an editor for junior devs?
Right, LLM integration should be a huge boon for junior developers.
JetBrains ships a local, offline AI auto-complete in PyCharm. Sure it's limited, but it shows it can be done. It's a pity other companies aren't trying the same, especially this one that boasts about millisecond editing times. Edit: JetBrains, not IntelliJ. Auto-complete details - https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2024/04/04/full-line-code-co...
I know I'm not the target market. I don't want my editor to have AI. I was really looking forward to trying Zed, but this just means I'll stick to VS/Code with the AI gung disabled. In general, if any product comes with "AI" I'm turned off by it.