based on the naming conventions established by OpenAI and StabilityAI, this may be the most dangerous AI company yet
[deleted]
Safe Superintelligence Inc.
91–100 of 1001 posts
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#92Probably the best thing he could do.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#93I am not on the bleeding edge of this stuff. I wonder though: How could a safe super intelligence out compete an unrestricted one? Assuming another company exists (maybe OpenAI) that is tackling the same goal without spending the cycles on safety, what chance do they have to compete?
Not with that attitude
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#94Incredible website design, I hope they keep the theme. With so many AI startups going with advanced WebGL/ThreeJS wacky overwhelming animated website designs, the simplicity here is a stark contrast.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#95[deleted]
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#96I know it is a difficult subject but whichever country gets access to this superintelligence will certainly use it for "safety" reasons. Sutskever has lived in israel and now has a team there , but israel doesnt strike me as a state that can be trusted with the safety of the world. (many of the AI business leaders are of jewish descent, but not sure if they have half their team there). US on the other hand is a known…
[deleted]
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#97At this point, all the computing power is concentrated among various companies such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, etc. It seems to me it would be much safer and more intelligent to create a massive model and distribute the benefits among everyone. Why not use a P2P approach?
Backprop is neither commutative nor associative.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#98I am not on the bleeding edge of this stuff. I wonder though: How could a safe super intelligence out compete an unrestricted one? Assuming another company exists (maybe OpenAI) that is tackling the same goal without spending the cycles on safety, what chance do they have to compete?
Honestly, what does it matter. We're many lifetimes away from anything. These people are trying to define concepts that don't apply to us or what we're currently capable of. AI safety / AGI anything is just a form of tech philosophy at this point and this is all academic grift just with mainstream attention and backing.
Ilya the grifter? That’s a take I didn’t expect to see here.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
the first step of safe superintelligence is to abolish capitalism
One can already see the beginning of AI enslaving humanity through the establishment. Companies work on AI get more investment and those who don't gets kicked out of the game. Those who employ AI get more investment and those who pay humans lose confidence through the market. People lose jobs, get harshly low birth rates while AI thrives. Tragic.
So far it is only people telling AI what to do. When we reach the day where it is common place for AI to tell people what to do then we are possibly in trouble.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
At the end game, a "non-safe" superinteligence seems easier to create, so like any other technology, some people will create it (even if just because they can't make it safe). And in a world with multiple superintelligent agents, how can the safe ones "win"? It seems like a safe AI is at inherent disadvantage for survival.
The current intelligences of the world (us) have organized their civilization in a way that the conforming members of society are the norm and criminals the outcasts. Certainly not a perfect system, but something along those lines for the most part. I like to think AGIs will decide to do that too.
They well may, the problem is ensuring that humanity also survives.