Live data from Hacker News

Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

supabase.com

91–100 of 194 posts

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#91

I wish supabase had more default integrations with CDNs, transactional email services and domain registrars. I'd happily pay a 50% markup for the sake of having everything in one place.

At the same time, I worry about them drifting too far from their core mission. I think Vercel and Netlify kinda went that way and when you look at their suite of features, you just have to ask why would I not just use AWS directly.

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#94
Just commenting to say I really appreciate your business model. Whereas most businesses actively seek to build moats to maintain competitive advantage and locking people in, actions like this paint a different picture of Supabase. I'll be swapping out the API my app uses for Supabase storage to switch it to an S3 API this weekend in case I ever need to switch it.

My only real qualm at this point is mapping JS entities using the JS DB API makes it hard to use camelcase field names due to PG reasons I can't recall. I'm not sure what a fix for that would look like.

Keep up the good work.

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#95

Dear supabase. Please don’t get bought out by anyone and ruined. I’ve built too many websites with a supabase backend now to go back.

This is my biggest reservation towards Supabase. Google bought Firebase in 2014. I've seen Vercel run Nextjs in to the ground and fuck up their pricing for some short-term gains. And Figma almost got bought by Adobe. I have a hard time trusting products with heavy VC backing.

What's the actual complaint here , other then company A buys company B.

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

are there any specific integrations that you want? (eg: which companies?) we have a built-in CDN[0] and we have some existing integrations for transactional emails [1] [0] Smart CDN: https://supabase.com/docs/guides/storage/cdn/smart-cdn [1] Integrations: https://supabase.com/partners/integrations

Thanks for the link about integrations! I wasn't aware about the resend one for transactional email. It'd be nice to have an integration with a domain register, like Ghandi.net or Namecheap. Ideally with the cost coming through as an item in my Supabase bill.

Resend founder here - feel free to try out the integration with Supabase and let me know if you have any questions

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the link about integrations! I wasn't aware about the resend one for transactional email. It'd be nice to have an integration with a domain register, like Ghandi.net or Namecheap. Ideally with the cost coming through as an item in my Supabase bill.

Thanks for the recommendations - I’ll see what this would involve

[deleted]

Re: Supabase Storage now supports the S3 protocol

#100
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell me about it. My simple SSG Next.js static site loads much slower than my Jekyll site on GitHub pages. And I can't figure out how to improve its speed or disable the "ISG" feature that I believe is to be blamed for the poor performance.

Not defending NextJS, I'm pretty out on it myself, but ISG requires a server to run. It pregenerates static content for defined pages and serves that until revalidating. If you've built a fully static bundle, nothing exists that would handle that incremental/revalidating logic.

I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
Post reply on HN