Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why did the plane go all the way to LAX rather than landing back at SFO? It clearly seemed to be considered serious since there were emergency vehicles by the runway as a precaution. Is it easier to divert to LAX rather than land back at SFO in this situation?
If you don't have to land with a full load of fuel it's better not to. And there was no reason to think that the landing would go wrong, because the tires are redundant.
Boeing 777 loses tire while taking off from SF, crushing cars on the ground
91–95 of 95 posts
Re: Boeing 777 loses tire while taking off from SF, crushing cars on the ground
#92Boeing shares seem unaffected by this event. Poor Boeing, this is what happens when you lose your “soul” as a company and you start chasing margins, profit, dividends and you don’t pay attention to you people and your product. Have seen it happening in many big companies, and I don’t understand why intelligent/educated/competent CEOs don’t see this :-(
Re: Boeing 777 loses tire while taking off from SF, crushing cars on the ground
#93Re: Boeing 777 loses tire while taking off from SF, crushing cars on the ground
#94Profit over all else, capitalism!
Re: Boeing 777 loses tire while taking off from SF, crushing cars on the ground
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Think about doing an investigation and writeup for every dent and fender bender in the nation, in addition to the major accidents. That’s essentially what you’re looking at, but for aircraft. Across the world, and all the millions of people and ways in which all types of aircraft are used, big, small, old, young, immaculately maintained, beat to shit, etc.
This is a changing of the goalpost and regardless we’ve had doors fly off just in the last month.