Earlier quoted context omitted.
sometimes it is: https://htmx.org/essays/a-real-world-react-to-htmx-port/
Yeah until a manager comes and says "well great, it works, now let's do a mobile app like that"
Form to DB
91–100 of 129 posts
Re: Form to DB
#92These types of projects always remind me of MS Access. Access is forms on a database, and really easy to use. It obviously has its drawbacks but nothing has come close to it. I've never understood why MS didn't capitalise on it by extending and improving it.
I never saw an Access database that didn't become a regretful mess after a couple of years - the person that made it left, no-one knew how to update it. Fancy validation built into the form that just got in the way when requirements changed. Thus I came to the conclusion that any Access database is probably better off being a spreadsheet, even with all the chaos that not having forms as a front end and not having rel…
Re: Form to DB
#93How new is this Retool product? The idea that OpenAI, Amazon, NBC, Mercedes, and Doordash all use it seems dubious.
Retool is very widely adopted by major companies.
Re: Form to DB
#94These types of projects always remind me of MS Access. Access is forms on a database, and really easy to use. It obviously has its drawbacks but nothing has come close to it. I've never understood why MS didn't capitalise on it by extending and improving it.
Because the single-system paradigm doesn't work any more. However, modern replacements do exist, Airtable is one of the first; it's basically the notion of a "spreadsheet with more structure", and then building forms and such on top of that. I've recently been playing with Grist and like it, although it is rough around the edges. https://www.getgrist.com
Re: Form to DB
#95Hi all, engineer who worked on forms @ Retool here. Excited to get HN’s feedback on a new product I’ve been working on: Retool Forms. There are a ton of form builders out there (e.g. Typeform, Google Forms, Airtable Forms, etc.) and honestly we weren’t really looking to build another one. But as a developer, I wanted my data in my database, not in another SaaS app (which probably has a shoddy API, like every example…
There is no download link, so how can this be self-hosted?
Re: Form to DB
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it is. It can be very frustrating not to be able to fill a form on mobile with a 3G connection just because some random dev decided that downloading 150kb of JS to render a simple form is fine. I mean it’s a form; we already have all the HTML elements already; why do you need React for? This is why nowadays we end up with Electron apps that take 6GB of RAM to display a chat.
It's really not that simple. What about complex validation rules? Do you really think it's user friendly to require them to send the whole form just to tell them "sorry no" 10 times over until they get it right? What about multi-value selects, potentially with rules? E.g. form field like "choose up to 5 locations in the radius of 10km". What about form fields like "pick a point on a map"? Etc. Don't act like every fo…
I wpould use my server-side form and database library, Bozen[1] to do this.
>
Re: Form to DB
#97How new is this Retool product? The idea that OpenAI, Amazon, NBC, Mercedes, and Doordash all use it seems dubious.
See comment by the CEO: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39476663 Retool is very widely adopted by major companies.
I may very well be nitpicking unfairly here, those marketing "trusted by" blocks on brand new products just always rub me the wrong way.
Re: Form to DB
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Detractors of the "html over the wire" movement are always talking about it as if the people working on this stuff didn't live through the jQuery days and are blindly repeating them.
What's wrong with jQuery? All my homies (favorite websites) are jQuery.
Re: Form to DB
#99How new is this Retool product? The idea that OpenAI, Amazon, NBC, Mercedes, and Doordash all use it seems dubious.
Retool is popular for building internal dashboards on top of you data. It has been there for many years
I said this in a sibling comment too, I may just be unfairly nitpicking here but these "trusted by" marketing blocks just rub me the wrong way when the product is brand new.
Re: Form to DB
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it is. It can be very frustrating not to be able to fill a form on mobile with a 3G connection just because some random dev decided that downloading 150kb of JS to render a simple form is fine. I mean it’s a form; we already have all the HTML elements already; why do you need React for? This is why nowadays we end up with Electron apps that take 6GB of RAM to display a chat.
It's really not that simple. What about complex validation rules? Do you really think it's user friendly to require them to send the whole form just to tell them "sorry no" 10 times over until they get it right? What about multi-value selects, potentially with rules? E.g. form field like "choose up to 5 locations in the radius of 10km". What about form fields like "pick a point on a map"? Etc. Don't act like every fo…
Well to be honest 99% of forms are 5 simple text inputs with a select. What was the last time you had to implement a "choose up to 5 locations in the radius of 10km", really?
> What about form fields like "pick a point on a map"?
Same thing: of course there are rich forms for which you need JS, but they are the exception, not the rule.