Live data from Hacker News

Google Ending Support for Jamboard

workspaceupdates.googleblog.com

91–100 of 289 posts

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#91

My job is all in on google. Gmail, meets, gcp, everything. Never heard of jamboard. We'd probably have been using it too, if we ever knew it existed! How is it that closure announcements are when we find out about these things? Especially from a company whose revenue comes from advertising?

While the (pricy) physical boards were targeted at corporations, the service's main target was probably schools.

Our kid actually uses Jamboard daily, I expect all schools of the area to be doing so, and I'm sure the admins are pretty pissed right now. I wonder if the chromebook sales have been taking too much of a hit and they're cutting losses as usual.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#93
I wonder if products like these are a dying market with distributed work.

What’s the benefit of a digital whiteboard when I have drawing tools on my computer for a fraction of the price, and the amount of time spent in the office has been cut by 50-100%?

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#94
Can someone please clarify: even the software version is winding down? If so, can they simply make all the whiteboards read-only via bitmaps/SVGs instead of migrating them elsewhere?

Edit: From reading the post properly it seems that it will be view-only for a temporary duration before they may be deleted/migrated:

> Between October 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024, the app will be placed in “view-only” mode, during which time you will still be able to backup your Jam files.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#95
How does Google not recognize the doom loop they’re entering with these decisions?

1. Google has already made it tremendously difficult for any product of theirs to succeed. They could have a product that’s extremely successful by any reasonably measure, but not at Google scale, in which case they kill it. So the standard of success a product needs to reach at Google is already ridiculously high.

2. Because Google makes so many products and has such high standards, they also kill a lot of products (and services). Which means they’re surely forming a reputation of introducing products to the market that will not survive. Which surely must be a drag on the initial uptake of every product as many people aware of Google’s history are unwilling to invest their time and resources using it. So in addition to the high standards to succeed, there’s also a significant drag in usage caused by the high likelihood of the product being killed.

Both of which lead to more products being killed which leads to future products being less likely to reach success and more likely to be killed and so on.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#97

How does Google not recognize the doom loop they’re entering with these decisions? 1. Google has already made it tremendously difficult for any product of theirs to succeed. They could have a product that’s extremely successful by any reasonably measure, but not at Google scale, in which case they kill it. So the standard of success a product needs to reach at Google is already ridiculously high. 2. Because Google ma…

I would agree about Reader, but Jamboard is not something I will miss. There are a lot better alternatives.

Re: Google Ending Support for Jamboard

#98
post #10

This is a bummer, I use Jamboard (the software not the hardware) to draw diagrams during Zoom calls and send the link to participants after. I mostly use a Wacom tablet to do the actual drawing. Any good free alternatives out there ? Edit: The proposed alternatives they mention in the update (FigJam, Lucidspark, and Miro) really don't fit that workflow.

Maybe not your workflow but I am so happy that we stopped using Jamboard and switched to Miro. It’s a universe filled with joy and happiness and freedom. Now I am looking for a free Miro alternative with at least two users and nothing is even close. Not sure what’s happening in the industry that makes people produce horrible UX and not being able to see how Miro does it properly.
Post reply on HN