Lifetimes ago as an intelligence officer I spent years tracking DPRK activities and developments. People shouldn’t underestimate their technical capacities or ability to recruit smart hard working people.
[flagged]
North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
91–100 of 302 posts
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I can't speak for the general public but my own impression of the country is that its nuclear weapons and isolation make it incredibly dangerous, and the problem is only getting worse as their arsenal increases. Plus they have pulled off a number of hacks that became mainstream news so I would expect plenty of people to think that North Korea has competent software developers.
Intuitively, we'd expect Kim to envy Putin, but at some point it occurred to me that the opposite notion seems to be better at explaining the behavior we've seen lately from Russia. If Putin's agenda were to turn Russia into a nuclear-armed failed state that the rest of the world has no choice but to prop up with aid in perpetuity, it's hard to see what he would be doing differently.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#93I wonder how legit are some of the most popular download sites: e.g ffmpeg windows binaries [1] are hosted from some random person’s site. Sure you can check the checksum etc but that still doesn’t guarantee any relationship with a specific git commit. I would just assume that non-gh or official hosted downloads (where reproducible/attested builds are available) are just state actors by default. Am I paranoid? How do…
https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/fr/security/news/cybercrime....
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#94Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Ending the war" requires handing South Korea over to DPRK based on their conditions and they still claim their government has rightful jurisdiction over it. I mean the war is effectively over. It's been a cold war since the "cease fire" has been adhered to. It's not like they're going to stop trying if we agreed to take down the DMZ. Their entire culture is based around reunification and defeating the evil Americans…
You could equally say ending the war means handing NK over to SK because that's what South Korea's constitution says. Less flippantly, "ending the war" means reaching a mutual agreement that preserves the two Korea's current territories: nobody sane is using the term to mean anything else. (BTW, South Korea did push for officially ending the war multiple times, IIRC. It's just that North Korea remains uninterested. S…
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#96I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#97I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#98I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly
"But the tool also has the ability to download and execute arbitrary code from an attacker-controlled domain."
Sounds like most software nowadays to be honest. The blog author does not really point out why this code would be more malicious than "normal" or how the code author is known to be Korean.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#99I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#100I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)