Live data from Hacker News

North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

blog.google

91–100 of 302 posts

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#91

Lifetimes ago as an intelligence officer I spent years tracking DPRK activities and developments. People shouldn’t underestimate their technical capacities or ability to recruit smart hard working people.

[flagged]

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37421831.

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#92
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I can't speak for the general public but my own impression of the country is that its nuclear weapons and isolation make it incredibly dangerous, and the problem is only getting worse as their arsenal increases. Plus they have pulled off a number of hacks that became mainstream news so I would expect plenty of people to think that North Korea has competent software developers.

What really makes me nervous about the DPRK is just how successful they have been at getting the rest of the world to prop them up. Successful models get imitated.

Intuitively, we'd expect Kim to envy Putin, but at some point it occurred to me that the opposite notion seems to be better at explaining the behavior we've seen lately from Russia. If Putin's agenda were to turn Russia into a nuclear-armed failed state that the rest of the world has no choice but to prop up with aid in perpetuity, it's hard to see what he would be doing differently.

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#93

I wonder how legit are some of the most popular download sites: e.g ffmpeg windows binaries [1] are hosted from some random person’s site. Sure you can check the checksum etc but that still doesn’t guarantee any relationship with a specific git commit. I would just assume that non-gh or official hosted downloads (where reproducible/attested builds are available) are just state actors by default. Am I paranoid? How do…

Even binaries hosted on an official website can be hacked, if they hack the website and change the checksums. It happened to Linux Mint.

https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/fr/security/news/cybercrime....

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#95
post #83
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Ending the war" requires handing South Korea over to DPRK based on their conditions and they still claim their government has rightful jurisdiction over it. I mean the war is effectively over. It's been a cold war since the "cease fire" has been adhered to. It's not like they're going to stop trying if we agreed to take down the DMZ. Their entire culture is based around reunification and defeating the evil Americans…

You could equally say ending the war means handing NK over to SK because that's what South Korea's constitution says. Less flippantly, "ending the war" means reaching a mutual agreement that preserves the two Korea's current territories: nobody sane is using the term to mean anything else. (BTW, South Korea did push for officially ending the war multiple times, IIRC. It's just that North Korea remains uninterested. S…

Right, which is why I said its effectively what we have now (a situation that preserves their current territories), AFAIK, the situation barely effect SK life. It's just neither side believes the minute they stop pointing weapons at each other's borders the other side won't take advantage, and as far as I know, prior attempts to sit down and end the war officially require the other side basically give a full surrender. There's also a Chinese interest in keeping DPRK (it was Chinese MiGs American fighter pilots engaged in the actual war and I assume currently supplies DPRK with arms in a similar role to the US and SK) as a buffer zone, and a source of cheap labor and source for human trafficking in some cases. So both countries have a larger country/acting ally disrupting the politics.

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#96
post #86

I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)

I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly

[deleted]

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#97
post #86

I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)

I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly

The 0-day is in a popular software package. The GitHub repo apparently contains a backdoor ability to execute code from the attacker. If I had to guess, this would be the software update functionality here: https://github.com/dbgsymbol/getsymbol/blob/cb4bdedc1a85c308...

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#98
post #86

I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)

I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly

Seems to be some dll:s included. Maybe there?

"But the tool also has the ability to download and execute arbitrary code from an attacker-controlled domain."

Sounds like most software nowadays to be honest. The blog author does not really point out why this code would be more malicious than "normal" or how the code author is known to be Korean.

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#99
post #86

I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)

I'm really curious where the 0-day is in the code of the project honestly

[deleted]

Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers

#100

I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)

I reported the repository as malware, guess we'll see what happens with it
Post reply on HN