Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, you're just making hasty judgements. I read scientific papers, articles and references in one pane while keeping GPT open in another pane to help me make the most use out of the knowledge in the quickest timeframe. I frequently browse additional resources in order to corroborate information. Please do not project onto me. Ask questions about my process before assuming I'm "depriving myself", which you are likely…
have you ever considered devoting your full attention to what you're reading? And that doing that enough will improve your scientific reading comprehension to the point you don't need to rely on chatgpt mangling the information into nonsense?
have you ever considered being less assumptive and judgemental? you have absolutely no insight into my reading comprehension ability, and have no idea what my process is like.
> you don't need to rely on chatgpt mangling the information into nonsense
except that doesn't happen? It only strengthens my understanding by allowing me to ask questions?
you really need to look at how you're approaching this conversation and calibrate. instead of this mess of assumptions and loaded questions, ask a real, open-minded question such as "what does your workflow look like? what are the pros/cons of this approach?"
if my system works for me, I don't need to prove it to you, however you yourself are missing out on a new style of research which will become incredibly common.