It’s landed! Congratulations to India on this great achievement!
Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
91–100 of 542 posts
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#92It’s landed! Congratulations to India on this great achievement!
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#93Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#94Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
> seems like such a gross omission. Almost all space mission code only ever has the so-called 'happy path'. We rely on extremely tight mechanical and aerospace engineering tolerances to achieve that happy path. The Hubble Space Telescope's primary mirror grinding was off by a matter of micrometres, and resulted in blurry images. Consider all the Mars rovers. Imagine some wind gust threw the descending module off cour…
When saying "we", do you mean you write code for the space missions? Writing only happy path code as a standard practice in the space sector seems quite absurd. You won't ever achieve absolute precision and errors do happen, yet it seems like systems recover most of the time. Recently, the antenna of Voyager 2 got misaligned, but it is expected to recover from that. That was only the last problem it encountered over…
Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]
#96Scott Manly has a video on why he thinks the last one failed. It sounds like their landing software didn't have "oh crap, we're way off course, just land wherever". It only had the happy path of "fly to here and land", so when it switched to the landing phase it tried valiently (including flying upside down) to try to fly back to the landing zone, but the landing zone was much further than fuel supplies allowed. Hope…
Incredibly Kerbal vibe. I think something like that happened to me when using MechJeb. (it even has a "land whenever" feature, which it was too late to use at that point)