91–100 of 225 posts
Is this material safe to handle? It feels like this thing soon will start appearing all over ebay and aliexpress
I hope it is. It will be a perfect toy for little kids, right along the little ball magnets.
https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/little-magnets-are...
Can anyone explain if the specimen was found through rigorous research or just sheer luck? Because it is starting to seem like it's the latter.
Is this material safe to handle? It feels like this thing soon will start appearing all over ebay and aliexpress
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously? To me this looks like a chip of graphite glued to an invisible thread. The way the object moves is not what I would expect from magnetism (see second 10 for instance)
How can it look like something that is ostensibly invisible? It's not swinging around like a pendulum, so what exactly are you seeing that makes you think it looks like an invisible string?
I have no idea what I’m talking about, but in other flux pinning demonstrations the sample seems to oscillate around the fixed point. That smooth settling looks like some sort of damping, like maybe a force that increases with distance, like maybe spring tension.
(Of course, “we have no idea” is an acceptable answer if that turns out to be the case.)
[flagged]
Please. Aliens are only a cover. It is well known that the pentagon has had a supercomputer that reached superintelligence decades ago and has used to slowly tickle advanced technology to the masses.
[flagged]
Please. Aliens are only a cover. It is well known that the pentagon has had a supercomputer that reached superintelligence decades ago and has used to slowly tickle advanced technology to the masses.
[flagged]
I said this was like pulling teeth. Sheesh.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>everything we’ve built was just incredible, one-in-a-trillion fortune that any of it worked at all. That’s not how revision in science works. We know that Newtonian mechanics was wrong and incomplete, but at the same time, it didn’t work by “luck” either.
That’s exactly how revision in science works; incomplete is wildly different from “wrong”, and most of our understanding of science would need to be fully wrong for aliens to do what is claimed they can do, to the point where we would have needed to get impossibly lucky in order to have built the things we have.
I’m not a physicist, but I am mathematically literate, so please feel free to direct me to technical sources.