Live data from Hacker News

I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

evhaste.com

91–100 of 209 posts

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#91
post #6

Honestly, while I believe a lot of the perspective shared, there always seems to be a huge lack of objective assessment of options for these folks. In tech there are many incredibly high paying jobs - taking control over your situation has a low bar. if you don’t like your manager, taking the view that if you escalate a formal complaint to HR (in doing so lose all trust you manager and HR may have in you), you’ll be…

[flagged]

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for this comment, I was just about to rage and you eloquently expressed a great reply! In addition I was about to add: How about the manager not use their internal prejudices to influence their decision and hide behind a thin veil of “what about my employees” and actually let their employees LEARN how to correctly interact with transgendered, queer, ethnically diverse co-workers and possibly come out of the…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#93

I've worked with a couple of people in tech who were very worker solidarity, unionize, labor movement, discrimination everywhere, etc. They must have been tiring for management to work with. And I go in to bat for my colleagues, and it has not always made me popular with management and executives, but there are better and worse ways of approaching things. If you are unwilling to accept that a decision has been made f…

> I'm not saying this person is wrong or did the wrong thing. I really don't have enough information. Despite what other people may claim about why this story was previously flagged, this is probably why: we don't have enough information to know for sure this story is the truth, but people are going to come armed with their own presuppositions and argue about it anyway. > On its face I would have to entertain the ide…

I don't think that's enough reason to be flagged.

90% of the submissions from people sharing their experience with a company/product here would fall under that description as well (and many of those are upvoted because they seem useful)

That dude who interned at repl.it a while back and posted about a mildly bad experience was upvoted to the front page for over a day. people had their pitchforks out.

I think we should maintain higher standards of evidence before getting our pitchforks out, but at the same time, we should let people have their platform if people find it discussion-worthy. In the case of Repl.it or the 1000s of posts of people being shadowbanned from big tech without explanation, we let people have their say, and we let the platform help them where possible. The HN algorithmic spotlight is usually pretty fair with illuminating all sides when they present themselves here.

The submission here is extremely detailed and well-written, and makes a great case. There are multiple claims made which, were they misleading or inaccurate, the other party could discredit quite easily.

But instead of doing that, we're seeing the post repeatedly get flagged.

There could be other reasons this is happening, and I assume many, like myself, are withholding judgment.

But the silence from Rune, and dialogue suppression tactics by mystery parties honestly just make me more inclined to believe there is at least a grain of truth in the original submission.

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not understandable. Some things you don't let yourself do and speak up when other people do.

As is the case with many anti-discrimination policies, often the actual result can be the opposite of what was intended. Many employees are not comfortable with the accommodations for trans colleagues required of them by their employer (and by our current legal environment). Those employees don't really have a means to have their concerns addressed: it is either comply or quit/get fired. A way around that is to simpl…

[deleted]

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for this comment, I was just about to rage and you eloquently expressed a great reply! In addition I was about to add: How about the manager not use their internal prejudices to influence their decision and hide behind a thin veil of “what about my employees” and actually let their employees LEARN how to correctly interact with transgendered, queer, ethnically diverse co-workers and possibly come out of the…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#96
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

What if you had an employee who was horrified at their coworkers' eternal damnation and worked tirelessly to save their souls? Seems like that might cause friction as well. Seems like we might have a standard answer for that sort of friction that works for most environments. The bulk of which, frankly, is just "don't be an asshole". But at the margins, we back that up with " at the very least , don't discriminate and…

[flagged]

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#97
post #6

Honestly, while I believe a lot of the perspective shared, there always seems to be a huge lack of objective assessment of options for these folks. In tech there are many incredibly high paying jobs - taking control over your situation has a low bar. if you don’t like your manager, taking the view that if you escalate a formal complaint to HR (in doing so lose all trust you manager and HR may have in you), you’ll be…

OP is a manager, good managers look out for their subordinates and surface issues so that they can be solved. Ideally before they become thorny legal issues. From this write up, it looks that OP did exactly this. At the beginning, she surfaced issues with two employees that could cause problems down the line for the company, she highlighted potential issues with documentations, requirements and test cases that would be problematic with the FDA (in any highly regulated environment like medical devices, making sure that the company is compliant is crucial and definitely the responsibility of any project manager).

So, she did exactly what she was hired for.

Re: I was laid off in retaliation for anti-discrimination whistleblowing

#98

Author doesn't present any evidence to back up claims that I saw. I don't understand why people make posts like this and don't back it up with exact and specific instances?

With the reference to comparing her employer to Alex Jones, I think the author is trying to sway the court of public opinion.

I hope the author has some hard evidence like emails or voice recordings that she's saving for a lawsuit.

Post reply on HN