Live data from Hacker News

Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

home.treasury.gov

91–100 of 1001 posts

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#91
post #5

There used to be a TV show in Europe called "Domino Day", where teams competed to build very elaborate domino structures. Used to love the sound of the dominos falling ...

If you don't know what the other dominoes are or when they'll fall, it makes for a very boring game of dominoes.

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#92
The Fed is giving banks an infinite credit line at par value of their assets.

This allows them to borrow and cash out any customer who wants, so long as they have assets.

This program would have saved SVB last week.

People may continue moving around money, but the runs are over.

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#93

Yellen and the FDIC is in a tough spot. This is the important line, "Any losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund to support uninsured depositors will be recovered by a special assessment on banks, as required by law." Thus, on one hand, I'm glad they're doing this, as it should help prevent wider bank runs, and it ensures that banks are the ones that are actually paying for it. At the same time, this is yet another exam…

How do you square this statement of yours:

> Yellen has just broadcast that FDIC insurance is essentially unlimited, as long as you can threaten wider disruption to the economy.

with this quote from the Treasury Dept statement?

> "No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer."

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#94

Yellen and the FDIC is in a tough spot. This is the important line, "Any losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund to support uninsured depositors will be recovered by a special assessment on banks, as required by law." Thus, on one hand, I'm glad they're doing this, as it should help prevent wider bank runs, and it ensures that banks are the ones that are actually paying for it. At the same time, this is yet another exam…

In cases where you can't predict the future appropriately, sometimes it's better to make prudent decisions that help everyone instead of attempting to punish the sinful. Keep in mind that bank shareholders and senior management are going to get wiped out and fired.

>senior management are going to get wiped out and fired

Wasn’t one of executives working at Lehman Brothers or some such before? This is just failing upwards and doing same thing.

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#96
What if the Federal Reserve offered retail banking. Would it stabilize the banking sector? They wouldn’t be forced to try to find loans to pay interest on deposits. Where do private banks add value over what the Fed could do. ELI5.

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#97

I'm just curious, who was running the investment / risk team at SVB and why should they get a pass for doing such a terrible job?

From the UK branch which also is in severe trouble[0]

Jay Ersapah, the boss of Financial Risk Management at SVB’s UK branch, launched initiatives such as the company’s first month-long Pride campaign and a new blog emphasizing mental health awareness for LGBTQ+ youth.

“The phrase ‘you can’t be what you can’t see’ resonates with me,’” Ersapah was quoted as saying on the company website.

“As a queer person of color and a first-generation immigrant from a working-class background, there were not many role models for me to ‘see’ growing up.”

Her efforts as the company’s European LGBTQIA+ Employee Resource Group co-chair earned her a spot on SVB’s “outstanding LGBT+ Role Model Lists 2022,” a list shared in a company post just four months before the bank was shut down by federal authorities over liquidity fears.

[0] https://nypost.com/2023/03/11/silicon-valley-bank-pushed-wok...

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#98
This is 100% a bailout and the wording that “no losses […] will be borne by the taxpayer” is a shameful misrepresentation. Just because a bunch of VCs and founders didn’t realize they were at risk of this happening if they kept all their money in one bank, they still bear the responsibility of their losses. Looking forward to this new future where uninsured deposits are actually 100% backed by the FDIC, so actually if your company spends any money to diversify or de-risk your banking posture based on how the rules are written, you’re a rube and potentially being irresponsible towards your shareholders

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#99
So much for moral hazard.

Capitalism is supposed to be about profit and loss, you bail out the losers, there is no end to the loss.

I guess we still haven't learned the lessons from 2008. Effective regulation should have been put in place to oversee that banks are effectively managing their risks. Not bailing out companies whenever times get tough.

Re: Joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

#100

I'm just curious, who was running the investment / risk team at SVB and why should they get a pass for doing such a terrible job?

The entire c-suite were running things at Lehman and DB and flew those into the ground, too.
Post reply on HN