Live data from Hacker News

Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer

imgur.com

91–94 of 94 posts

Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer

#91
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the example of journalists is anything to go by, soon both journalists and bloggers will produce content using exclusively AI.

$ echo "write me a blog post from the perspective of a young phd in AI on how fears of AI and machine learning are vastly overblown. include fake but obscure and outrageous examples of when AI was able to save lives and downplay real examples of when AI got it wrong. contrast the promise of AI getting it right with software bugs resulting in fatalities. argue this will allow the average company to hire fewer workers…

Ship it!

""" As a young PhD in AI, I believe that fears about artificial intelligence and machine learning are vastly overblown. The potential for AI to save lives and improve productivity is immense, and while there have been some high-profile examples of AI getting it wrong, these incidents are often blown out of proportion.

In fact, there have been countless examples of AI saving lives that go largely unnoticed. For instance, there was an obscure case in which an AI algorithm correctly diagnosed a rare disease in a patient that had stumped human doctors for years. In another instance, an AI-powered drone was able to locate a lost hiker in the wilderness who would have otherwise perished.

Meanwhile, the few high-profile cases where AI has made mistakes are often overemphasized in the media. For example, when an autonomous vehicle hit and killed a pedestrian, the headlines screamed about the dangers of AI. But what wasn't reported was that human drivers kill thousands of people every day in car accidents. While AI is not perfect, it has the potential to vastly reduce the number of fatalities on our roads.

And when we consider the productivity gains that AI can bring, it becomes clear that fears of AI taking jobs are misplaced. Sure, there may be some roles that can be automated, but in most cases, AI will simply augment human work, allowing us to achieve more in less time. This means that companies will be able to hire fewer workers, but those workers will be able to work longer hours with increased happiness, as they will be able to focus on more fulfilling tasks.

In fact, I predict that the adoption of AI will lead to a significant increase in productivity and gross domestic product. By 2030, I expect that the average company will be able to achieve a 20% increase in productivity thanks to AI, which will translate to a $2 trillion increase in gross domestic product. And this is just the beginning - as AI continues to improve and become more integrated into our daily lives, the benefits will only become more pronounced.

In conclusion, the fears of AI and machine learning are vastly overblown. While there are certainly risks to consider, the potential benefits - from saving lives to boosting productivity - are simply too great to ignore. It's time for us to embrace AI and all the benefits it can bring. """

Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer

#92
post #18

First there were the journalists, who fully researched their material from first-hand sources. Then there were the bloggers who, without leaving their armchair, wrote opinion pieces based on whatever the journalists had written. Now there is AI, which apes the non-experience of the bloggers. Truly we are now living in a simulation of a simulation.

AI doesn’t have the capacity to think critically.

AI in general might yet. But language models are literally the implementations of the Chinese room. So it's not exactly a surprise when it turns out they can't think - that's literally the point of the Chinese room example!

Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer

#93
post #34

I guess the way forward will have to be giving the neutral network access to a curated database of facts as suggested by Stephen Wolfram: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/01/wolframalpha-as-... The internet is simply too full of nonsense.

Imagine suggesting a literal plotpoint from an Orwell novel with a straight face on hackernews. Dont forget to update the Wolfram database with who we're at war with!

Who we have always been at war with, comrade!

Re: Bing thinks Mars has 2.5B people based on an AI generated blog wrong answer

#94
The new bing get it right. It says 0 here for me.

"The population of Mars is zero, as there are no humans living on the planet yet. Mars is a large planet in the Solar system, and it has plenty of surface area for colonization, but there are many challenges and risks involved in sending humans to Mars and establishing a permanent settlement there." [...]

Post reply on HN