Earlier quoted context omitted.
My list of what should be legally restricted in its availability is as follows: 1) Child pornography End list. National security is not enough of a reason for restrictions. Copyright is not enough of a reason. Further, the assumption that corporations or governments have exclusive moral authority to determine what constitutes impermissible material is, frankly, ridiculous. Giving them the authority to make such decis…
What is the reason for restricting that, and is there really nothing else it applies to?
Censorship just stops people from seeing the content; it doesn't deal with any of the root issues.