Live data from Hacker News

Guthib

guthib.com

91–100 of 137 posts

Re: Guthib

#91

I suppose after typing `git push/pull/commit/whatever` about a million times, the git part at least is deeply ingrained in muscle memory by now

On point. Though if someone struggles with repeating themselves, I can recommend oh-my-zsh git aliases. They replace common git commands with shorter equivalents, like git push -> gp, git pull -> gl, etc

Re: Guthib

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

It really depends on the degree to which your co-workers and clients lack a sense of humor. For example, in the early 00's I was working for a company that built a lot of CMS sites. One of the test images my co-worker used was Yoda driving a go-kart. A customer got offended, so we were instructed to use really boring images that just had the word "test" on them.

One time I built a product demo-ing a physician directory, I used pictures of Dr. Strange, Mr. T as Dr. T, Zoidberg–it was comedy gold.

Boss made me use boring stock photos instead :(

Re: Guthib

#96
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

No it's not nsfw? Now I'm really confused, can I very paste this into slack #random or not?

It's just that gif of David Hasselhoff in a speedo where it keeps zooming in on his crotch and it's just more David Hasselhoffs in speedos forever. An image that I assume anyone who's even heard of the Internet has already seen a hundred times. I wouldn't call it NSFW, personally.

[EDIT] I mean, contextually, if you're being weird about it or posting that kind of thing all the time, yeah, it could become NSFW. But I don't think sharing this particular thing maybe with a "warning: low-quality gif of Hasselhoff in speedo" in case anyone cares, is over the line.

Re: Guthib

#98
post #16
post #7

apparently https://gatlib.com and also https://butbicket.org/ also do the same

But mysteriously all slightly different. guthib: “You spelled it wrong.” gatlib: “You spelled it wrong.” + Google Analytics butbicket: “You spelled it wrong!” + meta refresh redirect

[deleted]

Re: Guthib

#99
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people are waiting to be offended. I used Mighty Boosh as a test image a couple of years back and was told off for it. https://imgur.com/a/hOfmKpy

This offended me by refusing to show anything without js! (I'm not serious, just in case that wasn't clear)

I am serious about that!

Re: Guthib

#100

This reminds me of https://gail.com/ which, according to the owner get an average 16k hit per day from people mistyping gmail.com

Wow, that's interesting. I would have thought it would be fun to own a popular mis-typed domain, but apparently not.

>> As for why there is very little content here, we wanted to keep the server's attack surface as small as possible to keep it safe.

Post reply on HN