Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Yes I really regret personally starting the war now, thanks.
The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
91–100 of 172 posts
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes I really regret personally starting the war now, thanks.
Yo, you laughed about how bored you were because it was so uneventful. It was uneventful for you . I’m not blaming you for the wars, but I do think some perspective on how they affected others is warranted.
Judge not, lest ye be judged
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yo, you laughed about how bored you were because it was so uneventful. It was uneventful for you . I’m not blaming you for the wars, but I do think some perspective on how they affected others is warranted.
And you know they don't have a good perspective on this how exactly? Judge not, lest ye be judged
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#94Bizarre to write something called "the real war" that is focused on American forces, who were, by any measure, enjoying vast advantages and resources unavailable to other combatants (including being able to choose the time and place of engagement). Below is a table of WWII military casualties by nation: World War II casualties - Wikipedia Soviet Union 8,668,000 to 11,400,000 Germany 4,440,000 to 5,318,000 China (1937…
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US was not in any significant danger of being directly invaded during WWII. It would have been an incredibly costly logistical nightmare for the would-be invaders, very unlikely to succeed. US worries were legitimate (atrocities perpetrated against civilians, future control of Europe/Asia, the international economic order and security of global trade networks, etc.) but “urgent” invasion wasn’t one of them.
Pearl Harbor was US. The Philippines was US. We were literally invaded. They also bombed the West Coast.
Two bombs, and it was basically a non-event. The intent was to start massive forest fires, but they failed.
They also shelled the West coast, and all they did was damage a baseball backstop at Fort Stevens and tear up the beach a bit.
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#96I can strongly recommend Fussel's (the author of this essay) book "The Boys' Crusade", which provides a very eye opening account to WWII. It is most likely a longer version of this essay (I haven't read this essay). I can also recommend his book Poetic Meter & Poetic Form, but for different reasons. Other books in the same vein: - The Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle by J Glenn Gray (Gray was a philosophy PhD a…
The Unwomanly Face of War by Svetlana Alexievich
https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/book-review-u...
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#97I didn't fight in WW2 obviously, but I did fight in a war. For me, the reticence to describe every detail to people who weren't there boils down to this: I don't want my wife, my children, or my neighbors to be burdened with thinking of something so horrible. I want them to be happy and safe, that's why I went. No need to bring it to their doorstep if I don't have to. I suspect many during and after WW2 felt this way…
Alternate perspective: I was in Iraq and Afghanistan, I don't talk about it because theres not much to say. I was either standing or sitting some place on guard duty, wired up on an insane amount of caffeine and nicotine, trying not to go insane for the 12 hour shifts. The only thing that punctuated the boredom was the daily mortar attack alarms lol
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#98Bizarre to write something called "the real war" that is focused on American forces, who were, by any measure, enjoying vast advantages and resources unavailable to other combatants (including being able to choose the time and place of engagement). Below is a table of WWII military casualties by nation: World War II casualties - Wikipedia Soviet Union 8,668,000 to 11,400,000 Germany 4,440,000 to 5,318,000 China (1937…
The purpose of the article was to detail the ways that the true visceral horror of world war two was sanitized or censored for public consumption. The contributions of individual nations in the Allied victory was immaterial for the purpose of that article. The title, "The Real War" is drawing a contrast with an imagined "fake" war, where men die with dignity, in important, courageous and heroic circumstances, for hig…
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#99I didn't fight in WW2 obviously, but I did fight in a war. For me, the reticence to describe every detail to people who weren't there boils down to this: I don't want my wife, my children, or my neighbors to be burdened with thinking of something so horrible. I want them to be happy and safe, that's why I went. No need to bring it to their doorstep if I don't have to. I suspect many during and after WW2 felt this way…
I haven't, my grandfather did. He was at Pearl Harbor, many battles in the Pacific (he was a submariner), in the end he was part of the occupation of Japan and earned many medals including the purple heart for almost dying in a sub accident. Only as an adult have I come to realize the gift he gave me. When I was a child, I spent a ton of time with him, he had a big hand in raising me. The picture he painted for the y…
Re: The Real War 1939-1945 (1989)
#100Countries that advocate a war or conflict, should fight this out on their own territory. This would solve a lot of problems in the world and would make up for the developmental deficit.