91–100 of 399 posts
What I want to see is a model that can generate 3D models for use in applications such as Blender. It would provide a good starting point for someone with talent to make beautiful. Or just save people like me time for making games.
"Our research takes the following steps to reduce the creation of harmful, biased, or misleading content." "Our goal is to eventually make this technology available to the public, but for now we will continue to analyze, test, and trial Make-A-Video to ensure that each step of release is safe and intentional." Are they really going to do a replay of OpenAI and Stable Diffusion? Deja vu coming soon.
What does "intentional" mean here? Does it mean that the person intends to type the text that they do? My cat sometimes walks across the keyboard, but for the most part I pretty much intend to type everything I type. Am I missing something?
Wonder if all these things will bring about a kind of cambrian explosion of creativity. Imagine a future of Prompt Wizards, who are able to coax the AI to generate things in a very specific way. Although we would probably need a much greater level of human curation. The way algorithms curate on youtube and spotify just doesn't really hit the spot. Perhaps stability and Dall-e already kind of showed that the value is…
I think we will definitely see a content explosion. The pessimist in me says that general levels of creativity and quality will go down, if anything. It's AI written blogspam, but for images and video too. The signal to noise ratio is getting worse and worse
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't think it will improve much from here That's a bold prediction. Why do you think that? The first thing I thought was the exact opposite. This isn't very good, but it's only version 1. Motion pictures are less than 150 years old. In another 150 years I bet virtual filmmaking will progress a lot.
Absolutely, particularly if you see this as simply another tool in the belt, like how Jurassic Park's thirty year old special effects absolutely stand the test of time because of them being a convincing mix of early CGI and puppetry. It's not hard to imagine that this kind of thing could end up doing a lot of the heavy lifting for things like background scenes in the future, opening up the kind of stuff we saw in The…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neural nets as an abstract concept don’t necessarily need to be built with atoms, just the substance of the external universe which may be far simpler.
I also didn't imply this neural network's universe needs atoms, but it needs to run the computation somehow, the computation itself is the complexity, no matter with what physics or other manifestation it shows up And if it is simulating our universe's atoms, then that part of it basically is our atoms. But is a neural net doing that really simpler than the atoms just running with a more direct mathematical model?
The > A golden retriever eating ice cream on a beautiful tropical beach at sunset, high resolution example is terrifying.
In case anyone else had problems finding it - it's at the bottom of the page: https://makeavideo.studio/assets/a_golden_retriever_eating_i... (webp) That grasp though. These things still feel a bit like e.g. Google/GCP services to me: Super appealing at first glance, quite close to what you want, but somehow never quite there. Maybe they'll asymptotically get there, eventually? Perhaps that statistical model can't re…
What I want to see is a model that can generate 3D models for use in applications such as Blender. It would provide a good starting point for someone with talent to make beautiful. Or just save people like me time for making games.
I've been looking into some of the 3D model generators this past week, and there is some work happening in that field. See the following non-exhaustive list: https://github.com/snap-research/NeROIC https://github.com/threedle/text2mesh https://github.com/AutodeskAILab/Clip-Forge https://nv-tlabs.github.io/GET3D/
I don’t want to think reality is a simulation, but wouldn’t our everyday experience being generated by a neural network be far far simpler to achieve than a universe of infinite minuscule atoms all interacting.. like ozcam’s razor is pointing towards our lives being a realistic dream. Like in 10 years you could plug this tech into high end VR and get a prompted reality dynamically generated that would be indistinguis…
ozcam’s razor is a human made concept, the universe doesn't obey human laws, it's the opposite > Like in 10 years you could plug this tech into high end VR and get a prompted reality dynamically generated that would be indistinguishable from our own. They said that 10 years ago about VR and it still is dog shit
The original Oculus was a step change, and current VR is a step change from that.
8k VR is coming and will be close to indistinguishable from reality visually at least.