Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay, so long as we're not being incredibly creepy and paranoid then.
You know what's incredibly creepy? 3000 faceless people in Palo Alto know more about your distant friends than you will ever know. Depending on how much time you spend on the site, they probably also have profiled a sizable portion of your thoughts simply by tracking clicks and pageviews.
Facebook is gaslighting the web. We can fix it.
91–93 of 93 posts
Re: Facebook is gaslighting the web. We can fix it.
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's argue Reductio ad absurdum. Why does not Google pop-up similar warnings when you click on its search results? -Because Google is dependent on the richness and abundance of third-party websites, for its search to be meaningful. What is the objective of Facebook? - To suck users into facebook.com, and sandbox them there. Similarly, the smaller objective of Facebook Social plugins is to lift the userbase from thir…
Google scans for malicious sites as well. The difference is of course, that on FB people share links whereas Google can just decide not to include a link in the results and the user will never know.
Re: Facebook is gaslighting the web. We can fix it.
#93I work on the team that generated the warning that seems to be the crux of this post. I am pretty convinced that it is a bug. His central theme, though, is a bit misguided. I don't understand why 1) using opengraph, or 2) using a like button implies facebook should trust your link and whitelist it. Even pages with those integrations can be malicious. In this actual case though, the notification link (generated from t…