Live data from Hacker News

A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

endtimes.dev

91–100 of 356 posts

Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

#91

Shameless self-promotion: the homepage of plaintextsports.com is 5.2kb today [1], an in-progress WNBA game (4th quarter) is 11.2kb [2], and an extra inning MLB game is 8.8kb [3]. I wasn't aware of this size threshold, and I'm not at this level of optimization, but I'm always pleased to find more evidence of my playful claim that it's the "fastest website in the history of the internet". [1]: https://plaintextsports.c…

It has a pleasing teletext aesthetic. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext

Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

#95
I wonder if anyone has studied the impact of latency on user behavior while considering the impact of user expectations from their typical connection speed. Whenever I see an article about page speed optimization, the assumption is that a user will give up if a page takes too long to load, ans that everyone gives up after X seconds. Usually X is about 7s based on a Nielson article from years and years ago.

The thing is tbough, a user who frequently uses satellite Internet or a 2G mobile connection will learn that pages take a while to download over that connection, and they will adjust their expectations accordingly. Satellite Internet users aren't giving up on pages every 7s. They're waiting because they know the page will load slowly.

I suspect most users wait for a page if most pages are slow. So long as your website is no slower than the average then you're probably not losing many visitors.

Obviously that's not to say you shouldn't make your website as fast as you can. You should. Everyone will appreciate the effort. But don't assume that knocking a few seconds off the TTI time will actually impact your conversion metrics. It probably won't (but only a proper study can prove it either way).

Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

#97
post #10

I'm getting 62 bytes over the network and 31.4 kilobytes uncompressed. This page has more content than most pages I visit that are megabytes in size. I wish there was an incentive to go back to smaller web pages in general.

The issue, I think, is that the web has become a kind of lowest common denominator app platform, which isn't really what it was originally designed for.

> which isn't really what it was originally designed for.

Also known as evolution.

Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

#98

Shameless self-promotion: the homepage of plaintextsports.com is 5.2kb today [1], an in-progress WNBA game (4th quarter) is 11.2kb [2], and an extra inning MLB game is 8.8kb [3]. I wasn't aware of this size threshold, and I'm not at this level of optimization, but I'm always pleased to find more evidence of my playful claim that it's the "fastest website in the history of the internet". [1]: https://plaintextsports.c…

so good! added to my bookmarks for future visits.

Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page

#100
post #34
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

62 bytes is surely not right :) I see your 31.4kb uncompressed, but 9.6kb over the wire.

This comment is 62 bytes and I haven't said anything of value.

compressed (100% compression ratio):

""

Post reply on HN