Live data from Hacker News

Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

accessnow.org

91–100 of 126 posts

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1984: Rajiv Gandhi’s Congress Party got a super majority (77%) 1980: Indira Gandhi’s Congress Party got a super majority (65%) 1977: Indira Gandhi's Congress Party got a majority (56%) 1971: Indira Gandhi's Congress Party got a super majority (68%) 1967: Indira Gandhi's Congress Party got a majority (55%) 1962: Nehru's Congress Party at 73% 1957: Nehru's Congress Party at 75% 1952: Nehru's Congress Party at 74% If th…

> If the complaint is, "Supermajorities aren't a Democracy" Is anybody actually saying that? For what its worth, I do think super majorities are corrosive long term for the multiparty Westminster style parliamentary systems. There is little incentive for compromise building or genuine debate on bills. It might even work if political parties had visible internal debate and discussion, and we can largely agree that thi…

No post body was provided.

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#92
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If the complaint is, "Supermajorities aren't a Democracy" Is anybody actually saying that? For what its worth, I do think super majorities are corrosive long term for the multiparty Westminster style parliamentary systems. There is little incentive for compromise building or genuine debate on bills. It might even work if political parties had visible internal debate and discussion, and we can largely agree that thi…

The original claim was that the senate was bypassed (non-democratic). A majority in the Senate is democratic if democratically elected etc. Whereas increasing the power of the executive as is the trend in the USA by bypassing the house / Senate is corrosive to democracy in my view.

The original claim was that the senate was bypassed (non-democratic).

A majority in the Senate is democratic if democratically elected etc.

I'm not sure what this means - that the NDA government could bypass the Rajya Sabha for 90% (the number quoted in the original claim) of bills? That doesn't make sense. I don't see how that is even possible.

The only way that the Rajya Sabha can be effectively bypassed is by the Lok Sabha speaker certifying a bill as a Money Bill (famously, the Aadhaar Bill was a Money Bill). In that case the objections raised by the Rajya Sabha are non-binding on the Lok Sabha and can be rejected by the lower house, and is deemed to have passed after 14 days. I do not think that 90% of bills introduced by the Modi government were Money Bills. So how does the claim of 90% work?

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#93
post #32
post #29

BRICS countries are going to continue the social credit/aadhar route and the West will watch jealously. This is nothing against China/India etc., I'm sure their populations do not like the direction either.

How is social credit in PRC in any shape of form comparable to AADHAR (SSN in US)?

"India's dodgy mass surveillance project should concern us all"

"Biometric ID card project Aadhaar links almost every part of a citizen's personal life to a state database"

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/india-aadhaar-biometrics-pri...

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#94
post #58

On the spectrum of privacy india is on the furthest end of it. No one cares about privacy and actively give their data over to everyone. For example every vendor asks for your phone number and people don’t question it at all. As great as the privacy law sounds I have a suspicion that it will just be used by police and the government to abuse authority and silence critics like they do with people tweeting anything the…

Wasn't this always the case? There were once huge "phone-books" containing all phone numbers in an area mapped to people's names. This is not much different from giving out emails

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> in India, it is illegal for an MP to vote against the party line Inn what way is this a functioning parliamentary system then?

> In what way is this a functioning parliamentary system then? You can ask other parliamentary systems the same questions. For example, the Australian Labor Party requires its members to pledge their support for the collective ui decisions of the caucus, which prohibits them from "crossing the floor" as well. Just as importantly, the Anti-“Crossing the Floor” law was passed in 1985 by the Congress Party under the lea…

Do Indian MPs explicitly pledge to toe the party line?

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#96
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the committee recommended major changes across the board in all sections of the act This bill was under discussion for 3 years. Every year the JCP keeps proposing new and different changes. After all this if you have 81/99 amendments, you have to question if it is nitpicking and stalling, especially when you have things like the Finance Bill and Farm Bill that get passed in record time. This seems like a political…

Not everything is political. I can tell you this because I work with many of indian government departments very closely. The reservations JPC highlighted will be studied and after consultation with stakeholders it will tabled again. FYI - The committee chairman and the IT Minister are from the same political party yet they disagreed and bill got pulled. Here is a good premier on the JPC Recommendation [1] https://vid…

Are these new concerns or concerns that arose during the preceding 3 years of discussions that remained unaddressed?

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#97
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is social credit in PRC in any shape of form comparable to AADHAR (SSN in US)?

"India's dodgy mass surveillance project should concern us all" "Biometric ID card project Aadhaar links almost every part of a citizen's personal life to a state database" https://www.wired.co.uk/article/india-aadhaar-biometrics-pri...

It's just a biometric Id system. Europe has one too, its actually very similar to aadhar in scope and usage. In fact the stated reasoning is identical to that of aadhar.

https://blog.hidglobal.com/2021/09/european-union-already-ro...

Though I doubt wired.com would do an article about the draconian European "mass surveillance database".

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#98
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The original claim was that the senate was bypassed (non-democratic). A majority in the Senate is democratic if democratically elected etc. Whereas increasing the power of the executive as is the trend in the USA by bypassing the house / Senate is corrosive to democracy in my view.

The original claim was that the senate was bypassed (non-democratic). A majority in the Senate is democratic if democratically elected etc. I'm not sure what this means - that the NDA government could bypass the Rajya Sabha for 90% (the number quoted in the original claim) of bills? That doesn't make sense. I don't see how that is even possible. The only way that the Rajya Sabha can be effectively bypassed is by the…

I think anuraj edited his comment. He originally said, “Modi bypasses parliament to pass his own bills.” So our debates are starting to lose context.

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In what way is this a functioning parliamentary system then? You can ask other parliamentary systems the same questions. For example, the Australian Labor Party requires its members to pledge their support for the collective ui decisions of the caucus, which prohibits them from "crossing the floor" as well. Just as importantly, the Anti-“Crossing the Floor” law was passed in 1985 by the Congress Party under the lea…

Do Indian MPs explicitly pledge to toe the party line?

Explicitly? No. At no point does a member sworn in as an MP have to then swear to affirm their party affiliation. In practice, however, the Anti-Defection Law deems anybody voting against the will of the party to have vacated their membership of the party, which can then be pursued to strip them of membership of the house.

Re: Indian government withdraws Personal Data Protection Bill

#100

In case you are serious about understanding why it was pulled out and really care about the details for such an action, I highly recommend you check the Joint Committee on the Personal Data Protection report [1] the Press Release section where they released the 534 pages report on it. Gist of it is - the committee recommended major changes across the board in all sections of the act so the IT Ministry would rework th…

You've got to be joking ...
Post reply on HN