Live data from Hacker News

The Seiko TV watch

sabukaru.online

91–100 of 138 posts

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#91
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Casio's solar models are even better -- you don't need even the once every few year battery change.

My $5 Casio has a "10 year battery"

Yeah mine too. I've had it since 2009 and only now the screen is starting to go a bit dim.

I'm really amazed every time I think about it.

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#92

when I was in high school I had a casio watch that doubled as a TV remote control that was responsible for a lot of random power off/change channel messages to the TVs at school... not as cool as an actual tv watch but was fun.

we had lots of laughs with HP-48 IR ports

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#93

Try this exercise: Hold your arm so a watch strapped on top of your wrist would be facing toward your eyes for easy viewing of its display. If you have a smartwatch, or any kind of watch, you do this many times a day. Now hold your arm in that position for 30 or 60 minutes to watch an entire TV show. You can take a break during the commercials. Enjoying that? Probably not. With a [smart]watch, you only glance at it a…

This assumes that this was intended as a truly practical item. However, this is a product of a watch manufacturer. Its usefulness is also defined in social terms. It's an expensive novelty item, a status symbol, a conversation piece, an icebreaker, etc, then it's also a practical item. This one doesn't achieve these social functions by mechanical complications, a multitude of jewels or fine engravings by monk-like ar…

This sounds very plausible. I wonder if it was the actual business case for making this watch. They must have had to justify the expense of development, I always wondered if they learn enough from the endeavour or gained enough from new tooling that that was the justification.

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#94
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Casio's solar models are even better -- you don't need even the once every few year battery change.

Few is an understatement. My solar atomic g shock hasn't needed a battery replacement in the 15 years I've owned it. They're rated for 10-15 years though, so I guess I'll see how it's holding up in another six months.

I would really like to own a GShock, but I just can't get over how small the digits are. I know I would be frustrated reading the time from a space that is maybe 1/15 of the watch face surface area.

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#95

I've always wanted one of these. Sadly, the LCD has failed in the majority of surviving examples, I believe the liquid part of the liquid crystal "escapes" over time. If you have an Apple Watch there's a new app called "WatchTube" that lets you watch YouTube on your watch, if you'd like to see if such a tiny video viewing experience is actually any good.

Thanks for mentioning it as I hadn’t heard of it before.

Here’s the app store link to save others multiple clicks:

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/watchtube/id1599884909

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#96
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They do, but how many viewing hours do you get from a single battery charge?

The decoding is probably in the same order of magnitude as listening to music from your watch. The screen brightness is the limiting factor. Based on always-on displays on the Apple Watch you are probably looking at 8 hours or so? So decoding with the screen on might be 5 hours?

The always-on display drops power usage by being quite dim and reducing the update frequency to 1 Hz. 24-60 Hz video will draw way more power

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#97
post #79

This feels like discovering a time capsule which holds the early signs of why Japanese women aren't interested in Japanese men anymore.

The statistics actually show the opposite - Japanese women are still interested in men, it's the men who aren't interested in women

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#98
post #86

Try this exercise: Hold your arm so a watch strapped on top of your wrist would be facing toward your eyes for easy viewing of its display. If you have a smartwatch, or any kind of watch, you do this many times a day. Now hold your arm in that position for 30 or 60 minutes to watch an entire TV show. You can take a break during the commercials. Enjoying that? Probably not. With a [smart]watch, you only glance at it a…

> Enjoying that? Probably not. As a kid? Immensely.

Definitely. As a high school kid in the early 90s a classmate once had a pocket sized TV. The tiny screen and terrible viewing angle didn't stop us from crowding around it during break time!

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#99

Try this exercise: Hold your arm so a watch strapped on top of your wrist would be facing toward your eyes for easy viewing of its display. If you have a smartwatch, or any kind of watch, you do this many times a day. Now hold your arm in that position for 30 or 60 minutes to watch an entire TV show. You can take a break during the commercials. Enjoying that? Probably not. With a [smart]watch, you only glance at it a…

It was good enough to be featured in a James Bond movie. For many companies, I think that's the only kind of thing they care about.

They definitely got that product placement for free, and the license to the movie clips for their advertisement. Wait...

Re: The Seiko TV watch

#100

Try this exercise: Hold your arm so a watch strapped on top of your wrist would be facing toward your eyes for easy viewing of its display. If you have a smartwatch, or any kind of watch, you do this many times a day. Now hold your arm in that position for 30 or 60 minutes to watch an entire TV show. You can take a break during the commercials. Enjoying that? Probably not. With a [smart]watch, you only glance at it a…

You've missed the selling point, which is watching sports on your wrist. For the Japanese, that's sumo and baseball, mostly.

Neither requires you to pay full attention to your wrist for 30 minutes.

Not that this was a wildly successful product, but the point wasn't to watch a sitcom, complete with commercial breaks, without moving.

Post reply on HN