Live data from Hacker News

Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

digest.bps.org.uk

91–100 of 287 posts

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#91

I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.

Muji has no markings or logo at all.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#92
In addition to the use of still photos, this study has a problem in that dress is indicated to the subjects before they make a choice that is distilled down to trust, and the choice game is known to test trust by a substantial portion of the public. While it makes some intuitive sense to appear disarming to win the trust of strangers in some real-life contexts, I wouldn’t rely on this study to corroborate that.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#94

I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.

>> I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.

The irony being that actual "high-class" clothing is exactly what you're describing, at least since I've been a lucid adult. Seems like there is a bit of an inverse correlation between a person's income and the amount of logos they'll tolerate on their clothing.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#95
A long time ago in one of the first properties I rented the washing machine stopped working. My flatmate called the agency and a day later, I think it was a Saturday morning, a rough looking man turned up to repair it. I remember he had a tattered pair of working jeans and a similarly tattered polo shirt on. He pulled the machine out, took it apart diagnosed the issue and popped out to his car get a part. While he was gone my flatmate clued me in to the fact that was the owner of the property, who also owned the agency, and in turn owned a awe-ful lot of property in the local area. The guy had popped out to his brand new land rover to dig out a part from the back. I was completely blown away at how humble and down to earth he was.

Years later I worked with a guy, a multi-millionaire, the guy lives in one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in London. Again dressed in a normal pair of jeans and t-shirt, nothing too noteworthy. I remember him telling me how dry and boring his neighbours are, too concerned with 'things'. When he wants to go for a pint rather than go to his local, he heads to the less well off area a few streets over to the pub there and enjoys the company of normal people.

From these and other experiences I've come to think that the more you look, and act, like you've 'got money' the less you actually have.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d offer that those wearing advertising logos on their clothing don’t have much understanding of fashion. Frankly, it’s vulgar.

A significant portion of fashion is wearing fashion logos.

And fashion has supplanted function.

Anecdata from just last week...

My partner wanted some new running trainers. She went to a popular high-street store here in the UK called JD Sports and said to the assistant "I'm looking for some new running shoes". In a bizarre fit of honesty the lady said:

"Sorry we don't really do running gear here, we sell more fashion items."

I'm sure her manager would have been appalled to overhear it, though perhaps the assistant is into sports herself and made an honest distinction between quality sports gear and the logo-heavy branded items in the store.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#97

I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.

I’d offer that those wearing advertising logos on their clothing don’t have much understanding of fashion. Frankly, it’s vulgar.

It depends on the context, its not as black and white as you think it is.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#98

I was having this talk the other day: I hate "high end" logo clothes and don't want to compete with people that showcase their logo clothes. The average clothing store is decent enough for me. I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Just plain material and colors.

I would buy clothes with no distinctive marks if I could find them. Uniqlo

It's were I buy all my black V-neck tee shirts for work. H&M for my pretty pattern short sleeves when I am in that summer mood.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#99
post #2

Any kind of self-promotion is unpleasant, except to other self-promoters. For them its competitive. And yes, this includes the virtue emojis on Twitter and GitHub.

>virtue emojis on Twitter and GitHub That's pretty unnecessarily negative/uncharitable. I know people (usually older) who are perfectly un-self-interested and unconditionally sympathetic to all people who use "virtue emojis" very innocently/sincerely on their social media. All you have is the word of my anecdote, but these individuals are not engaging in self-promotion (unless one expansively defines it to include al…

Then this is not the kind of person i would enjoy hanging around. In my social circles, when you show of any kind of virtue without delivering, you are mocked, and in my opinion, rightfully so.

Re: Wearing flashy/status clothes makes people less likely to cooperate with you

#100
post #89
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Came here to make this comment. More than 80% of my wardrobe is from Uniqlo, including 10 dry pique polos, 20 supima cotton tees, and 10 flannel button ups, all black. Makes getting dressed in the morning stress-free because I know I'm going to like how I look every day. The blacks do not fade — I have 5-year-old shirts that look practically as good as 6-month-old ones. Their jeans, especially their selvedge jeans, a…

Uniqlo is too normcore for my taste.

Same for me. It took me some time to find a brand that doesn't dazzle everybody with their logo, uses the fabric and design that suits me, is durable enough and so on. I place a substantial order and forget about clothing for a few years.
Post reply on HN