Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's too bad. If you didn't make that call it would probably have larger market share. What you've done actually feeds in to the problem.
But that's the issue. It's not my problem. My problem is maximizing the user experience for most of my users, and that involves squashing usability bugs common to all browsers and adding features that have been requested, not keeping up with the Gecko quirks-du-jour. (Speaking of "quirks-du-jour", the problem eventually "solved itself." The next major iteration of Firefox fixed a rendering regression and resolved the…
See it is your problem to offer something to the general public then serve only the defacto monopolist instead of web standards. Because with each small compromise we each contribute to the problem until it reaches a breaking point. All the while those on the margins suffer, some with no real alternative.
For ex in poorer areas where they cannot afford a computer that runs Chrome (which has no LTS/ESR).