Live data from Hacker News

The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

mjg59.dreamwidth.org

91–100 of 137 posts

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven’t seen any comments encouraging anyone to buy this phone. If you take making fun of the phone and the people dumb/gullible enough to buy the phone, “encouraging republicans to buy this phone,” well, I don’t know what to tell you. If someone is so full of spite for the evil leftists that they’ll run to anything some of those users make fun of, that’s on them. But no one thus far has encouraged anyone to buy th…

Here? I don't think you're going to see any. And I think there's a legitimate use-case for people who feel that their favorite social networks are censored. Doesn't matter if the apps are full of garbage, that is what they want.

I don't think this phone can unban abusive former Twitter users for the user, so it still won't support that use case (in addition to being not great at privacy)

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#92

Jolla's Linux-based Sailfish (descendant of Nokia Maemo) runs on Sony Xperia 10 II (2020 device), https://jolla.com/sailfishx-5/

The hardware is quite underwhelming though. Sony as always deliberately crippling their mid-level phone to protect sale of their flagships...

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#93
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem here is that "Freedom" in "FreedomPhone" does not seem to be "freedom" the way free software advocates define it, or privacy advocates define it; it seems to be "freedom" the way far-right activists use it as a dogwhistle. If people are a bit focused on the company's politics, it's because they put those politics front and center. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that if there was some company d…

Re: [1] I was wondering what a phone targeting left-leaning people would look like, but I think that's pretty much just Twitter, Tumblr etc? You seem to disagree on this point, so I'd be curious to hear more.

No post body was provided.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love the irony that the "American Conservative" Freedom phone is just a generic phone from a Chinese tech company...

Quoted post unavailable.

Not trying to excuse it, but at least they were free.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#95
post #40

Anything that includes bloatware is untrustable. No question. Why even bother? You can't seriously run a project like this, add a load of bloatware, and expect to be trusted. Even that misjudgment is enough to understand that the people running this have no genuine interest in user privacy. Talk about undercutting your own reason for existing.

Anything referencing blockchain or cryptocurrencies is a scam. That also applies to the original Signal.

I would say that there are scenarios where blockchains are legitimately useful.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#96
post #92

Jolla's Linux-based Sailfish (descendant of Nokia Maemo) runs on Sony Xperia 10 II (2020 device), https://jolla.com/sailfishx-5/

The hardware is quite underwhelming though. Sony as always deliberately crippling their mid-level phone to protect sale of their flagships...

Is this true, though? Their mid range phones are usually $400-$500 cheaper than their mainstream flagships.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reality has become indistinguishable from the onion since somebody actually built and shipped a five blade razor

Reality overcame the Onion when somebody actually built and shipped a seven blade razor. I wish I were making this up.

They went full circle and now Gillette is selling a premium razor for sensitive skin… with two blades. No kidding: https://gillette.com/en-us/products/razors-trimmers-and-blad...

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#98
post #14

Somehow with multiple comments about how embarrassing the phones association with republican organizations is, no one seems to be talking about how they backup your messaging data in a possibly insecure way and exposing peoples email address if you have an associated phone number. Surely I can't be the only one who finds it incredibly frustrating to see how many people think being republican associated is noteworthy…

Indeed. When I clicked on the thread I expected more serious technical analysis of the bad security. I could get "lol stupid suckers with victim mentality" pretty much everywhere else on the internet. Fortunately at least some of the more egregious comments have since been edited. When a bunch of the comments are about how stupid the target demographic is, when there's tons of interesting technical meat to talk about…

> when there's tons of interesting technical meat to talk about

There is nothing technically interesting to talk about - its litterally big tech tech with an eagle, fighter jet and amaerican flag skinned on it.

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reality overcame the Onion when somebody actually built and shipped a seven blade razor. I wish I were making this up.

They went full circle and now Gillette is selling a premium razor for sensitive skin… with two blades. No kidding: https://gillette.com/en-us/products/razors-trimmers-and-blad...

Jillette, the best the Gullible Man can Get! - Now with over 24 rotating nano-blabes!

Re: The Freedom Phone is not great at privacy

#100
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything referencing blockchain or cryptocurrencies is a scam. That also applies to the original Signal.

I would say that there are scenarios where blockchains are legitimately useful.

Such as?
Post reply on HN