Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be nice if it were true, but neither are better. Yes, both perhaps have less pernicious ad tracking and placement, but they just don't feel as effective
DuckDuckGo seems to have equivalent or better results for non coding-related queries Bing has the best results for porn Google still wins for coding stuff though. Other than that it’s a cesspit of irrelevant keyword ads and SEO spam
Why does Google still have the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button?
91–93 of 93 posts
Re: Why does Google still have the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button?
#92Unrelated to the article, I also enjoyed the layout of the blog
I had to view the source to read the article since it seems text won't display without javascript. I know it's considered a lost battle to expect sites to at least make basic static content (text/images) accessible without needing to execute 3rd-party code/trackers, but I still judge sites that can't.
Re: Why does Google still have the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button?
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be nice if it were true, but neither are better. Yes, both perhaps have less pernicious ad tracking and placement, but they just don't feel as effective
DuckDuckGo seems to have equivalent or better results for non coding-related queries Bing has the best results for porn Google still wins for coding stuff though. Other than that it’s a cesspit of irrelevant keyword ads and SEO spam