Live data from Hacker News

Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

files.gallery

91–100 of 189 posts

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#91
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The answer is simple, it's just kind of says an ugly thing about how computing has shifted; it's essentially the same reason e.g. the iPad didn't have a file manager. Interfaces got really good and slick at the same time it became profitable/useful to alienate people from their own data for profit.

Files have some drawbacks... they're difficult for multiple people to work on together (slides). They're often not easy to organize, and they're often not available where you want them.

If you use something like Syncthing[0] (great, can recommend) you'll get them available exactly where you want them: on all your devices.

The only real problem with it is conflicts, where one file is edited simultaneously on two devices. I think Dropbox has solved that (?), but I'd rather keep my data on my own computers.

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#92

The output is very polished and fast, I like it a lot. Unfortunately it's not technically a single file as it depends on code downloaded from their server, therefore it can't be deployed locally without Internet connection. From the forum: "In terms of license, you don't need an internet connection. However, Files app loads it's own Javascript, CSS and several plugins from CDN (jsdelivr.com), and this requires intern…

> In any case, for now it's not possible to load Files app without internet

This is a major turn-off IMO. One of the main points of self-hosting is that you don't rely on the outer internet. If a self-hosted service relies on externally hosted resources, does this make it partially self-hosted?

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#93
post #82

The output is very polished and fast, I like it a lot. Unfortunately it's not technically a single file as it depends on code downloaded from their server, therefore it can't be deployed locally without Internet connection. From the forum: "In terms of license, you don't need an internet connection. However, Files app loads it's own Javascript, CSS and several plugins from CDN (jsdelivr.com), and this requires intern…

Weird, they could embed all of this in the php file and echo it, keeping it one file.

They sure could with a build script that just dumped all those resources into the single PHP file. It looks generated anyway.

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#95
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The answer is simple, it's just kind of says an ugly thing about how computing has shifted; it's essentially the same reason e.g. the iPad didn't have a file manager. Interfaces got really good and slick at the same time it became profitable/useful to alienate people from their own data for profit.

Files have some drawbacks... they're difficult for multiple people to work on together (slides). They're often not easy to organize, and they're often not available where you want them.

You can have other interfaces in addition to the files, that discourage, perhaps strongly, getting to them directly.

But it's always been straight up evil to completely remove all meaningful access to them, and yet Apple et al chose to go in this direction.

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Files have some drawbacks... they're difficult for multiple people to work on together (slides). They're often not easy to organize, and they're often not available where you want them.

If you use something like Syncthing[0] (great, can recommend) you'll get them available exactly where you want them: on all your devices. The only real problem with it is conflicts, where one file is edited simultaneously on two devices. I think Dropbox has solved that (?), but I'd rather keep my data on my own computers.

Syncthing handles conflicts about as elegantly as possible, I think?

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#97
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most shareware was nagware

WinRAR was a great example. Now we have 7zip and PeaZip. Things evolve.

Before that, we had WinZip, which is still around and trying to sell its program suite.

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#98

As per [1] from below - Apparently it's a nag-based paid software with an otherwise restricted feature set. This is not clearly explained on the page. In fact, it looks like the site goes out of its way to try and pass for free software - the Demo is NOT of what you are actually downloading, no pricing info, no mention of Basic vs Full versions anywhere, including the Docs, except for an dull looking blurb at the ver…

> The page also pulls a lot of scripts off the Internet on every load

It loads 14 resources from https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#99
post #98

As per [1] from below - Apparently it's a nag-based paid software with an otherwise restricted feature set. This is not clearly explained on the page. In fact, it looks like the site goes out of its way to try and pass for free software - the Demo is NOT of what you are actually downloading, no pricing info, no mention of Basic vs Full versions anywhere, including the Docs, except for an dull looking blurb at the ver…

> The page also pulls a lot of scripts off the Internet on every load It loads 14 resources from https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/

Does that make it a 15-file photo gallery and file manager?

Re: Files – Single-file photo gallery and file manager

#100
post #99
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The page also pulls a lot of scripts off the Internet on every load It loads 14 resources from https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/

Does that make it a 15-file photo gallery and file manager?

Absolutely.

This also makes it completely broken if these dependencies are inaccessible or go missing.

Post reply on HN