I am fundamentally not interested in managing monthly bills for things. You won’t win me by asking for recurring donations. Just ask me for ten bucks for some one-time symbolic upgrade. Also I’ve recently been back on the App Store for the first time in a long while. WHAT IS GOING ON?! The gall for simple, offline only apps like a little piano keyboard to want monthly fees for continued use. There isn’t even an illus…
So you don't have any insurances?
Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
91–100 of 226 posts
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
These are not requirements for most messaging app users. I just want secure messaging. I don’t care if it’s open or interoperable. WhatsApp if it was run by a non profit.
Most messaging app users don't really care about encryption either. Most (or at least a large minority) probably wouldn't mind if their messages were used to 'deliver ads more suitable for you'. It doesn't mean these aren't important issues. Until Signal drops the phone number requirement (nothing beats that for efficient user tracking), allows desktop use without requiring a smartphone anywhere in the process, open…
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#93I'd argue that $5/month is quite high. Not because Signal isn't useful, but because the actual incurred cost per user is much, much lower. Of course, not everyone is going to pay. But if Signal were to ask users to pay, say $10 per year , i'm sure there'd be a lot more payers.
That being said I do think there's value in a $1/month option, because that shouldn't be hard to rationalize. If something that's ad-free, operationally simple, and provides an improved level of privacy for it's users - one that requires humans and services to operate and be maintained - and still that can't be rationalized at $1/month, then the end user doesn't value what Signal is or can offer. Never mind the tradeoff one makes for "free" alternatives.
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#94Reminder that Signal server source code is not fully released and the app is heavily dependent on google services to operate. Signal also takes measures against third party or unofficial apps. Whatever you say about privacy Signal is not an ally of user freedom.
These are not requirements for most messaging app users. I just want secure messaging. I don’t care if it’s open or interoperable. WhatsApp if it was run by a non profit.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10451559/One...
TLDR: people are just not aware of their requirements
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#95I'd argue that $5/month is quite high. Not because Signal isn't useful, but because the actual incurred cost per user is much, much lower. Of course, not everyone is going to pay. But if Signal were to ask users to pay, say $10 per year , i'm sure there'd be a lot more payers.
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#96Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you might be talking about Brian Acton's loans to them? If so, yeah, they have to pay those off at some point, which begs the question why they took a loan in the first place. They were getting grants and things like that, so taking millions that they have to pay back, especially from a guy who sold WhatsApp to Facebook is... an interesting course of action.
No set time they must be repaid. As close to a gift as you can get.
This is from Signal Foundation's Wikipedia. There is a schedule.
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#98Reminder that Signal server source code is not fully released and the app is heavily dependent on google services to operate. Signal also takes measures against third party or unofficial apps. Whatever you say about privacy Signal is not an ally of user freedom.
What do you mean 'not fully released'? It's here: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server
Re: Signal users can give a recurring monthly contribution
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please continue to contribute to Wikipedia. It's one place in the internet I can go and not be bombarded with ads.
True, but you'll periodically be bombarded by donation drives instead... Money ruins everything, sadly. Where's my barter system...
Donation drives aren’t misleading. Donation drives don’t use shadow profiles. Donation drives don’t impact content. Donation drives don’t convince my grandma that she needs to send the IRS Target gift cards.