Live data from Hacker News

Facebook chooses profits over people

peoplesworld.org

91–100 of 253 posts

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#91

That's any for profit company no matter what anyone believes. Any company its only purpose is profit. It's the same with company HR it's there to protect the company. It's not personnel anymore it's called human resources for a reason you're just company inventory. And "corporate culture" there is none they are not your family there is no culture they'll fire you in a heartbeat.

> And "corporate culture" there is none they are not your family there is no culture they'll fire you in a heartbeat This isn’t what corporate culture means. It’s a set of shared behaviours and norms. The language used, approaches taken, behaviours tolerated and condoned and discouraged. Some companies have coherency in this. Others don’t. Facebook does, it’s consistent, and it’s horrifying.

Could you please give some examples of this?

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Profit does not just need to be money based, it can also be defined on mental health and well being no?

You should leave this site immediately and never dare return.

LoL why? surly we can measure profit in other forms then money. It's 2nd meaning is simply advantage, benefit. Example "there is no profit screaming at referees from the bench"

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#93
post #75

That's any for profit company no matter what anyone believes. Any company its only purpose is profit. It's the same with company HR it's there to protect the company. It's not personnel anymore it's called human resources for a reason you're just company inventory. And "corporate culture" there is none they are not your family there is no culture they'll fire you in a heartbeat.

> Any company its only purpose is profit. This isn't true for any company, not even investment banks. When people start companies, money is seldom a major reason, and as they grow they get a life of their own. Even large companies are run by people, people with feelings, insecurities, ambitions. An incredibly wealthy leader of a large corporation is not really motivated by money, he wants more status, he want to look…

your opinions can reliably be laughed at forever.

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#94
This is precisely what I tell people whenever they think they can harness Facebooks algorithm and censorship powers for good.

"But we can use it to amplify 'the right' stories, and bury 'hateful' ones!"

No, you can't. And the more and more power you give Facebook to shape morality, the more you'll find that society's morality is guided by what companies consider profitable.

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#95

That's any for profit company no matter what anyone believes. Any company its only purpose is profit. It's the same with company HR it's there to protect the company. It's not personnel anymore it's called human resources for a reason you're just company inventory. And "corporate culture" there is none they are not your family there is no culture they'll fire you in a heartbeat.

> And "corporate culture" there is none they are not your family there is no culture they'll fire you in a heartbeat This isn’t what corporate culture means. It’s a set of shared behaviours and norms. The language used, approaches taken, behaviours tolerated and condoned and discouraged. Some companies have coherency in this. Others don’t. Facebook does, it’s consistent, and it’s horrifying.

i read the OP to mean that most companies include in their "culture" that you are part of the "family". but that does not reflect what we came to understand families to be. i.e. your uncle does not get ostracized for underperforming.

although, i have to say, dysfunctional families do exist...

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#96
post #37

People do this too to be fair. The most notable people in the world are people who hoard wealth. We put all our points into commercialism, of course people would sell their own grandma for a few quid. We wanted this apparently.

If I hoard a billion news papers clippings I'm a mad man but if I hoard billions of dollars I'm a hero this seams like a bit of a paradox in itself no?

> if I hoard billions of dollars

If you literally "hoard," as in store it up and hide it away [1], yes, that would be crazy. But nobody does that. Those billions are invested and working.

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hoard

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything “for the masses” has to compete to win over the average and below average intellects. From what I can tell, that means that you have to get more and more sensationalistic to keep market share. You’re competing with a lot of addictive content out there, and educational content generally doesn’t fare well in that regard. Remember all of those educational video games in the past? Math blasters? They sucked. The…

Is life and being alive not already the game that achieves this unless I'm mistaken it's the ultimate education platform, so maybe the answers are in finding a new way to address it.

People play games and consume media mostly to get away from life, because life has many aspects that suck.

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#99
The problem is that the road to hell is paved with gold. It's not that Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, et. al are choosing a little extra profit over people, it's a LOT of extra profit over people.

That's why this needs legislation. You don't get to be the CEO of a Tech giant without being, at a minimum, ruthless; asking ruthless people to "do the right thing" and give up a lot of money for the good of "other people" is never going to work.

To be clear though, Facebook is the worst and I believe that Zuck is a sociopath who would happily ruin people's lives for another nickle.

Re: Facebook chooses profits over people

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I hoard a billion news papers clippings I'm a mad man but if I hoard billions of dollars I'm a hero this seams like a bit of a paradox in itself no?

> if I hoard billions of dollars If you literally "hoard," as in store it up and hide it away [1], yes, that would be crazy. But nobody does that. Those billions are invested and working. [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hoard

Well as long as it's technically not hoarding, problem solved! Nobody is hungry anymore :)

Come on mate you know what we mean..

I'm not even calling to get shot of billionaires, I just want them to pay their damn taxes

Post reply on HN