Live data from Hacker News

French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

reuters.com

91–100 of 361 posts

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would, but the last time France tried imposing a carbon tax there were riots in the streets. This might be the best we can hope for.

As long as no one figures out what's been taken from them.

The riots were because filling a car tank would get expensive. I’m not sure people would not notice, until a majority of the population is driving electric.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#92

Overall I am for this, but I do wonder if most short domestic flights are business trips. I can definitely imagine a situation where if I was taking frequent day trips for work and that extra 30 minutes to an hour is the difference between me seeing me kid before they go to sleep or not choosing to take the flights.

To me, the best solution to this kind of scenario is video calling, which is currently being normalized and will be readily accepted going forward.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#93

I'm not an economist, but wouldn't it have been better to tax the carbon emissions? If you could offset the carbon emissions for 10 EUR, maybe add 12 EUR to the price of a ticket and use that money to buy carbon offsets? That way those who still want it can still fly, and we're at net negative emissions.

It would, but the last time France tried imposing a carbon tax there were riots in the streets. This might be the best we can hope for.

It was a carbon tax on gas that was going to affect the lower classes disproportionately. I don't think we'd see an uprising for a carbon tax on intra-national flights, which are much more of a business travel mode

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Railway systems usually dont play well with capitalism as there is very little competition (given that infrastructure and the train operator is usually a state owned company). Aviation is simply much more efficient.

> Aviation is simply much more efficient. Efficient, how? It uses much more energy, makes more noise and creates more pollution. The speed has very little to do with the funding model. Flights were still faster in the 1970s when many state-owned airlines operated, and trains are little different when private companies run them (see: several European countries).

Don't forget about those rails. A lot of energy is locked in them, not to mention land. Planes need airports and nothing more.

Planes also spend their time where there is less wind resistance to deal with.

Trains are still a win, but it isn't as clear as it seems.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#95
post #37
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And flights costing 29 EUR are simply a market (and policy) failure. In no reasonable sustainably operating economy would we ever have gotten into a situation of flights being cheaper than train trips.

> And flights costing 29 EUR are simply a market failure That’s actually the market working as intended. In the case of flights you have competition which drives the price down, in the case of trains you mostly have a monopoly of the national operator which increases prices each year (DB, Germany). Train prices are prohibitively high, and when I face the choice I always end up driving vs taking the train (the price a…

Sometimes those 29€ are just the emerged part if the iceberg, with local airports subsidies which distorts said market.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#96
To be noted : we have a extensive fast train system. As a user, I prefer to take the train. It’s faster, more confortable and overall less hassle. ( you get from city center to city center, no security check; you can move around, use your mobile hotspot or the train wifi )

The one use case is going from Paris to Toulouse for instance. It’s take a day of train. But even Paris-Marseille is less than 3h at this point.

Paris, Lyon, Lille; Marseille, Nantes, Strasbourg; Those are our « top » cities and they are all connected with fast trains.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#97

There is no reason to fly short distance if you want to go from city center to city center. However, if you're already arriving or leaving on a long distance flight, the whole overhead of getting to/from/through the airport disappears and those 1.5 hours start making a difference. I think forcing companies to advertise more honest flight durations and prices could make a huge difference. If the airline tells you that…

Thanks for getting into the details. The fine prints change everything.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#98

There is no reason to fly short distance if you want to go from city center to city center. However, if you're already arriving or leaving on a long distance flight, the whole overhead of getting to/from/through the airport disappears and those 1.5 hours start making a difference. I think forcing companies to advertise more honest flight durations and prices could make a huge difference. If the airline tells you that…

Moscow and St Petersburg are ~700 km apart. It takes 4 hours by high-speed train, 8 hours (a night basically) by low-speed train you can sleep in, or about an hour by plane. And none of these are optimal. You have to spend those 4 hours awake if you're taking the high-speed train, you might get annoying neighbors if you take the low-speed one (and some people also don't fit into those berths), and all 3 airports in Moscow are in the middle of nowhere, so it essentially takes the same 4 hours if you fly.

And I'm not taking price into account, it varies a lot. I'm just ranting that there isn't a good option for this kind of distance. Not long enough to fly, but a bit too long for a train.

Oh and you're only left with the slow train if you want to spend a day, including the evening, in Moscow, and return at night.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#99
post #48

There is no reason to fly short distance if you want to go from city center to city center. However, if you're already arriving or leaving on a long distance flight, the whole overhead of getting to/from/through the airport disappears and those 1.5 hours start making a difference. I think forcing companies to advertise more honest flight durations and prices could make a huge difference. If the airline tells you that…

"Planes take longer to travel city centre to city centre" always gets trotted out in these discussions, but it's the wrong comparison. People don't all live in the city centre. Airports are usually outside the city, but well served by motorways and public transport. I wouldn't be surprised if more people can reach Charles de Gaulle or Orly within 45 minutes at rush hour than can get to Gare de Lyon.

> I wouldn't be surprised if more people can reach Charles de Gaulle or Orly within 45 minutes at rush hour than can get to Gare de Lyon.

Actually, I would. The highways around Orly (A6 and A86) tend to be extremely congested during rush hour. Add to it that the areas around those airports aren't that densely populated and are sufficiently far out so that public transportation has to go through Paris if you're not close by, and I don't think that more people are able to reach the airports quicker than Gare de Lyon or Gare du Nord.

Charles de Gaulle is even further out in the "country" so I think there are even less people able to reach that quickly, especially via the A1 and A3 which are also congested all the time. Then once there, the airport is so huge that just getting around it may take you a good 15-20 minutes.

Note that for some destinations south of Paris there are TGVs departing from Massy, which is a couple stops away from Orly. The same applies for CDG and the north.

Also, Paris is only one end of the journey. On the other side, the public transit situation isn't always as great. It's either some sort of bus, which takes forever (especially during rush hour), or some taxi which may be somewhat quicker than the bus but will cost an arm and a leg.

Re: French lawmakers approve a ban on short domestic flights

#100
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I largely agree. One issue with France is that their train system is very Paris-centric. Want to go from the Rennes northwest to the Toulouse in the southwest? Yeah, you’re going to go through Paris in the centre of the country. Same with Bordeaux to Lyon. Takes about the same time driving as high-speed rail takes a horseshoe route.

Are there direct flights though?

I did Rennes-Toulouse multiple times (it was actually the example I was going to give in this thread). It's 10 hours by train, 2 hours by plane. So as long as there are no direct trains, if flying was to be banned, there would be no short way to do Rennes-Toulouse anymore.
Post reply on HN