Live data from Hacker News

Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

novaramedia.com

91–100 of 112 posts

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#91

I'm not against technology: I'm against inferior technology. I know what you can build with a computer: with a smartphone not so much. I don't see many professional sound engineers, architects, chip engineers, developers and all the myriad of profession requiring serious tools to do serious work working from their mobile phone or from their Internet-of-Insecure-Shitty-Poinless-Thing-with-a-3-inches-screen (yup, I kno…

Not disagreeing with you, but I do think there is something to be said about the platform provided by mobile tech. Artists can live stream themselves to massive audiences from their bedrooms. And in the professional field iOS has become quite useful for music. As a couple examples, there are numerous iOS instruments (often with external midi control) made by well known companies like moog and korg, and live sound eng…

This reminds me of the disdain with which some of those who used mainframes and minis looked upon the early microcomputers. That was clearly a step back in some ways (you couldn't even run a LISP compiler on those), yet micros made computing ultimately more accessible to a much wider share of the populace and eventually displaced minis (and threatened mainframes and confined them to a niche market).

The CPU in pricier smartphones outperforms the one in yesteryear's desktop for a while already. It's just that the UI and (usually missing) periphery isn't necessarily best suited for traditional computer applications like software development.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#92
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you explain how this relates to hackers being the new Luddites? I haven’t had a chance to listen to the podcast yet but I can’t see how it’s description or yours relates to the title.

I'm a Luddite and a luddite. There's a distinction that folks fail to make: in my jargon, a Luddite opposes the automation of labor without a plan to support the displaced laborers (as the followers of Ludd), and a luddite opposes the use of technology (a perverse interpretation of Ludd as an opponent of technology) I automate all kinds of stuff for my job, of course; I'm a cyborg and my brain works better when I can…

> I'm a Luddite and a luddite. There's a distinction that folks fail to make: in my jargon, a Luddite opposes the automation of labor without a plan to support the displaced laborers (as the followers of Ludd)

Being aware of the effects of automation seems wise. My problem with Ludditism as a philosophy is that it seems to focus anger on the businesses that created the jobs in the first place rather than focusing energy on the government (ie, the people) making more jobs.

Why does offering someone something become a promise to keep doing so?

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#93
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it’s the same process, just at a higher velocity. Jobs have always been at risk of obsolescence. Jobs either require continual learning (typically the “professions”, e.g., physician, lawyer,...) or were at risk for being irrelevant. In the past, the pace of irrelevance was often slow enough to span a lifetime or multiple generations so people could still make a (slowly dwindling) living. Now the turnover just…

One thing though, if even programming (a somehow advanced human endeavour) gets deprecated then something is wrong with our culture.

I agree, but think that statement does a disservice to programming by treating it as a monolithic domain. It’s telling a mechanical engineer “mechanical things will never deprecate”. That’s true, but doesn’t help the ME whose career may have been built in, say, a fossil fuel power plant.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#94
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's be realistic.. let's say you are a c++ programmer and want to learn some modern JS framework. I bet you it will literally take less than a week of concentrated study work for you to become better than 80-90% of people working with it. You can get a book on the subject, there's great tutorials, heck, just reading the reference will get you far. This is true for a lot of stuff on youtube, coursera etc. I believe.…

Why on earth would you think that? C++ programmers are not “better” than web developers. They work in very different domains, and skills built up in one don’t necessarily transfer to the other.

C++ has a high barrier because it exposes the inherent complexity of computing. If you've managed to fight through that you can probably pick up the simplified concepts in Javascript, Python, Ruby, etc.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#95
post #68
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, as a separate comment, the day will come where software development is automated in some capacity. All the high skill workers may be competing with workers with much less training at lower wages. The Luddites are a good cautionary tale about when you should protect your working conditions and rights (when the demand for your services is at its peak). So many engineers I talk to these days say things like, "Why…

> the day will come where software development is automated in some capacity. It already is. It's called a compiler.

Then there are DevOps pipelines and scanning tools.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#96
Jonathan Corbet in this week's LWN:

> Your editor recently moved house; part of that move involved carefully packing up the dust-covered household television set, gently transporting it to the new home, and lovingly moving it to its new location — followed by gracelessly dropping it on the floor while lifting it into place. The search for a replacement involved asking a salesman for a reasonable "non-smart" television, a request that was met with mirthful incredulity. It would appear that such things no longer exist; all televisions are built to be placed on the network now.

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/850218/d38e18d65e4d8fc5/

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#97
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One thing though, if even programming (a somehow advanced human endeavour) gets deprecated then something is wrong with our culture.

I agree, but think that statement does a disservice to programming by treating it as a monolithic domain. It’s telling a mechanical engineer “mechanical things will never deprecate”. That’s true, but doesn’t help the ME whose career may have been built in, say, a fossil fuel power plant.

I have a feeling that anybody in physically based engineering will never lose use of his knowledge. You don't spend time using trendy inventions at the pace of computing. Many programmers fiddle with plumbing onto until they get a new position. Not a lot to remember beside social reflexes and 'best practices'.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#98
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, but think that statement does a disservice to programming by treating it as a monolithic domain. It’s telling a mechanical engineer “mechanical things will never deprecate”. That’s true, but doesn’t help the ME whose career may have been built in, say, a fossil fuel power plant.

I have a feeling that anybody in physically based engineering will never lose use of his knowledge. You don't spend time using trendy inventions at the pace of computing. Many programmers fiddle with plumbing onto until they get a new position. Not a lot to remember beside social reflexes and 'best practices'.

The pace is certainly different but I’ve found most engineers lose those skills that aren’t directly relevant to their job at hand. Ask that power plant engineer to do fluid dynamics and they’d likely be lost. The physical engineering disciplines are often hyper-specialized as well

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#99
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a feeling that anybody in physically based engineering will never lose use of his knowledge. You don't spend time using trendy inventions at the pace of computing. Many programmers fiddle with plumbing onto until they get a new position. Not a lot to remember beside social reflexes and 'best practices'.

The pace is certainly different but I’ve found most engineers lose those skills that aren’t directly relevant to their job at hand. Ask that power plant engineer to do fluid dynamics and they’d likely be lost. The physical engineering disciplines are often hyper-specialized as well

Sure you forget but if you come into a fluid dynamic problem, you know that the universe didn't move to a new paradigm, I assume it's a different feeling to know that you can revisit the knowledge instead of navigating a totally new structure.

Re: Are Hackers the New Luddites? [audio]

#100
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why on earth would you think that? C++ programmers are not “better” than web developers. They work in very different domains, and skills built up in one don’t necessarily transfer to the other.

C++ has a high barrier because it exposes the inherent complexity of computing. If you've managed to fight through that you can probably pick up the simplified concepts in Javascript, Python, Ruby, etc.

C++’s complexity has nothing to do with the “inherent complexity of computing”. It’s just a kitchen sink language.

Likewise, concepts in the domains of the languages you mentioned aren’t “simpler” — they’re just different.

Post reply on HN