Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most people just quote the Medium post without having done their own research. These are the best two links I've found that put all the accusations into context: https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ https://www.wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-the-web
I read the top link, very good. It strikes me that RMS writes a lot about sex, rape and minors. Well, we all have interests. If the article is anything to go by, it confirms my hunch that he says a lot of things that are prone to misinterpretation. While I would think it is his fault (we have a duty to say controversial things in a way that the audience can understand), this still doesn’t seem to be a good reason to…
He writes quite a lot about many subjects, and there's a huge corpus of text written by him. He has written a handful of paragraphs regarding sex, rape and minors, and all of these are quoted on that website. But it does not seem that this is a subject that he's particularly interested in.