Why do people go to work when they're sick? I don't understand for the life of me, how someone thinks it's ok? If you don't feel well, your company (or money) is not worth your life or the lives of others. Stay home ffs.
Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
91–100 of 415 posts
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#92I wonder if we could implement some sort of cap and trade system to make everyone happy? Everyone could be rationed a certain number of gatherings per month and then each person would be free to choose how to use them. They could use one to see family during the holidays, they could go to a protest, go to a wedding, celebrate in the street, go to a movie, etc. We could even track them as discrete tokens, or "social c…
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#93It’s interesting that the reporter here is shaming a wedding reception and not the long-term care facility where the deaths actually occurred. And not shaming for people for going to work with obvious Covid-19 symptoms, both to a prison and a long-term care facility . It’s clear the editors needed a story about family gatherings and not yet another story about old folks homes being high risk.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
So... my body, _not_ my choice?
Sure, just like drunk driving or twitching your trigger finger when someone just happens to be in front of the gun.
Poor example, as Firearms safety 101 would prevent this:
- always point weapon in safe direction
- finger off trigger until ready to fire
- know your target and what is behind it
- treat every weapon as if it were loaded.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#95It also demonstrates why the "personal choice" stuff is BS here. I see a lot of folks going "why are you worried if you're following the rules yourself?", and yet... > None of the victims who lost their lives had attended the party.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Over the next 38 days, the virus spread to 176 other people. Seven of them died. Seven people died. This isn't some hypothetical where people are acting like there's risk where there isn't; it's a story of seven real, living, breathing humans passing away.
People die. I'm becoming more and more callus about the whole thing and beginning to think we just need to adjust our expectations and accept that people die . I was told recently that my town is in terrible shape and the hospitals are nearly overwhelmed. Listening further, I learned that "nearly overwhelmed" meant we had capacity for two or three people to be really sick with Coronavirus. If we need to decimate our…
Would you believe it if I told you that not fighting the virus has an even bigger toll on the economy? Imagine if we'd aggressively addressed this problem back in March, how much less economic impact would have resulted. But then, as now, we wanted to "protect the economy" and avoid restrictions as long as possible. But this time the strategy will work? I have trouble believing that.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Over the next 38 days, the virus spread to 176 other people. Seven of them died. Seven people died. This isn't some hypothetical where people are acting like there's risk where there isn't; it's a story of seven real, living, breathing humans passing away.
People die. I'm becoming more and more callus about the whole thing and beginning to think we just need to adjust our expectations and accept that people die . I was told recently that my town is in terrible shape and the hospitals are nearly overwhelmed. Listening further, I learned that "nearly overwhelmed" meant we had capacity for two or three people to be really sick with Coronavirus. If we need to decimate our…
Also, the word for "cruel disregard" is callous.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's very clearly not murder; that'd set really bad precedents. You might be able to pull off something like involuntary manslaughter, but I tend to doubt it.
Also empirically speaking isn’t the death penalty not actually shown to be a great deterrent? [1] [1] first google result I found. https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death-penalty/death-penalt...
The professor(and ordained priest)'s conclusion was the following: "Most Americans believe in Hell, but none of them think they're going there."
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#99What are HNers planning to do for the holidays? We’re seriously considering not seeing anyone, not even parents, even though my SO has had COVID already (she works at a hospital and contracted it from COVID patients). Stories like this are the main reason. Even if no one at the party gets very ill, the chance of further spreading it to others seriously scares me.
Hell, I face a bigger risk coming in to work every single day because my employer insists on all hands on deck despite the pleading of my state's governor.
Re: Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed by holiday gatherings
#100Thanksgiving is going to be one massive super spreading event, and I shudder to think about christmas.