Live data from Hacker News

Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

numfocus.org

91–100 of 288 posts

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#91
1. Who are "these" people?

2. Is this org of any significant importance?

3. Why should I care.

Or, am I being to mean and should someone here complain about my topics?

Meanwhile, is numfocus really on the map. Until yesterday, I never heard about them before.

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you think it’s possible to empathize with people who are harassed, or experience harassment, and oppose codes of conduct? Assume that empathy includes caring about protecting people.

Sounds like "I empathize with them but I don't care about protecting them"

Not to me it doesn't.

I'm on the fence on this issue but it's sounds like you're willfully misreading that statement.

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#94

The context for those out of the loop: https://www.fast.ai/2020/10/28/code-of-conduct/

It was a very effective response from Jeremy. He clearly describes his side of the story and convincingly explains why he thought he did nothing wrong.

What is a little more troubling is that he (A) describes codes of conduct in detail and repeatedly affirms his allegiance to the general idea behind CoCs, including describing "previous sexual assault allegations" as "behaviors" he "strongly agrees" should be stopped. (B) He goes some way towards portraying himself as a victim, describing in graphic detail his lack of "emotional resilience". I wonder if he realized what a thin line he was walking with (A), because he now has a "previous CoC violation allegation" on his permanent record, regardless of his acquittal.

In other words, he very strongly backs the spirit, letter, and zeitgeist of CoCs before describing why he thinks he did not violate them in this specific case. I think these were very wise tactical moves, although they leave a bad taste in my mouth, and I can't help but wonder if this approach affected the outcome. I don't recall seeing an apology ever given, let alone changes instituted, for CoC violation allegations.

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#95
post #45

Ok, I'm not heavily steeped in this, but at first glance this seems like total bullshit. Note that the original complaint was both 1) that the code of conduct people were being, well, total assholes, and 2) that the complaints were so obviously ridiculous that the entire exercise seemed like it could only be a power trip for those involved. The apology addressed neither. They apologized for being unclear about what s…

The CoC members should all be expelled from the NumFocus community. They have done far more to make NumFocus a a non-welcoming community than just about any CoC violation.

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#96
Here are the people responsible who are too cowardly to sign their real names:

Leah Silen, Executive Director leah@numfocus.org +1 (512) 831-2870 or +1 (972) 896-3688

Andy Terrel, President andy@numfocus.org

Nicole Foster, Executive Operations Administrator nicole@numfocus.org

Walker Chabbott, Communications & Marketing Manager walker@numfocus.org

I find it disgraceful how mealy-mouthed their response was, how they conveniently spread the blame out across the committee, don't directly address where the ball was dropped (and by who), don't even address not letting him tell his side of the story, and then trying to excuse their actions with a distracting paragraph about why the video hadn't been posted.

I found Jeremy's post yesterday [0] very measured and clear, this on the other hand was a garbage "apology" that sidestepped any real responsibility or consequences.

[0] https://www.fast.ai/2020/10/28/code-of-conduct/ (HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24926214)

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#97
post #3

I'm going to get downvoted for this, but: I'm against code of conducts because they're worse than the problems they try to solve. edit: In my opinion, code of conducts become a distraction and a cause for worry to anyone contributing to these projects because someone inevitably gets their feelings hurt and points to some well-intentioned rule in the CoC to get the 'offender' shamed/removed even if no harm was intende…

why would you get downvoted for expressing the dominant opinion of HN on this matter? have you ever read a CoC thread on here?

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#99
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mean this as an attack, but I'm guessing you haven't been harassed/given unwanted attention at a conference. It's easy to see codes of conduct as draconian or unnecessary if you can't empathize with the people they're designed to protect. I'm not saying the CoC system is perfect or that there aren't false positives, but your statement here is _dramatically_ privileged.

If you need a CoC to get rid of someone who harasses others what you have is a deeper problem

And, indeed, the tech industry has had and continues to have a deeper problem.

Re: Public Apology to Jeremy Howard

#100
post #45

Ok, I'm not heavily steeped in this, but at first glance this seems like total bullshit. Note that the original complaint was both 1) that the code of conduct people were being, well, total assholes, and 2) that the complaints were so obviously ridiculous that the entire exercise seemed like it could only be a power trip for those involved. The apology addressed neither. They apologized for being unclear about what s…

Just curious, what would You suggest as a remedy to this situation? This is an honest questions please don't get offended.
Post reply on HN