Earlier quoted context omitted.
Excuse me?
I would not engage with the user "verdverm". They are arguing in bad faith, attempting to put anyone who disagrees with them on the defensive, and attempting to pivot the conversation when they're unable to do so. Below, I had a similar debate with this person. They attempted to get me on the defensive by turning the conversation to the 2014 murder of police officers in New York, and continually bringing it up as a w…
I believe you are the one to avoid conversing with, to go so far as to make this comment I am replying to.
Is the view that much better that from your moral pedestal?
The point is to get you to think with a more open mind. Sometimes that takes ruffling a few feathers. I mean you no ill will. It is quite the opposite, if you learn to love without prejudice. This is a very difficult thing that few ever master. I am most definitely not among those who have.
You will feel differently and better in time though. How long depends on your reaction, because that is all we can do, react. I cannot make you angry, only you can.
This is not victim blaming, this is straight from the Dali Llama's mouth. I experience emotions, and later visit them without attachment and letting them control my condition again. I am a much happier person when I do this well, regardless of the original emotion, and equal treatment for both good and bad emotions. Getting overly enthusiastic is as bad as depression.
Again, the only person you can ever hope to control is yourself.