Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

github.com

91–100 of 118 posts

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#91
post #89

An easier way to achieve this using a raspberry pi would be to simply have the pi press the right button on the garage remote. I took a pass at this a few years ago. Compared to messing with larger electronics, it’s a much easier setup. https://www.heyraviteja.com/post/weekend-projects/open-garag...

There are direct hookups on the back of basically every garage door opener for connecting wall switches you could use too to make it even simpler.

Would you need extra electrical components? The cool thing with the garage remote approach is that you don’t need any extra electronics, just plain microcontroller.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#93
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The 'throw a relay on the door opener' is doing exactly the same thing hitting the interior button to open the door. It sends the same signal to the motors and doesn't bypass any of the load limiting or safety sensors. Those are basically safe.

Those projects can be made safe, but they generally don't mitigate the hazards that compliance with this section will: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/1211.14 They are not the same thing as a human pressing the button.

I prefer to use BLE microcontrollers rather than real networking because it basically makes a better and more secure remote control rather than opening folks up to this danger.

I think very few people plan to open their garage door from across the continent with these projects

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#94

I'm not going to point out the big things wrong with this project, because someone might think "oh, if I just fix those things I'm good". I will say I think it's the worst garage door opener project I've seen on hackernews yet. Nothing wrong with messing around with motors in the workshop but the author of this one should keep his project away from other human beings. Probably pets too. Here's the CPSC page on garage…

I did a similar project at my home & I dare say it is safer, though technically much uglier. It consists of a Raspberry Pi with a PiFace Digital board (with relays). The relays don't drive the motor directly: it "pushes" (shorts/connects) the manual open/close button on the garage door's system board.

Yeah that’s the right way to do this.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#95
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those projects can be made safe, but they generally don't mitigate the hazards that compliance with this section will: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/1211.14 They are not the same thing as a human pressing the button.

Those are a bit overkill, I've not had any garage door that beeped for opening for remotes for example and that's a similar distance of triggered by someone not in the immediate area. They should be safe based just on the break sensors and current limiting.

Those are the industry requirements written by people with understanding of the hazards of running a garage door opener out of line-of-sight of the door. Read them carefully. There are reasons for each of them. Think hard about it.

Remotes also operate differently than your wall button. Did you know that?

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#96
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are direct hookups on the back of basically every garage door opener for connecting wall switches you could use too to make it even simpler.

Would you need extra electrical components? The cool thing with the garage remote approach is that you don’t need any extra electronics, just plain microcontroller.

Just a simple relay between the contacts.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#97
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those projects can be made safe, but they generally don't mitigate the hazards that compliance with this section will: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/1211.14 They are not the same thing as a human pressing the button.

Those are a bit overkill, I've not had any garage door that beeped for opening for remotes for example and that's a similar distance of triggered by someone not in the immediate area. They should be safe based just on the break sensors and current limiting.

You are absolutely correct. I have no idea when this site became this way, but a lot of the responses here are disappointing. I can easily close my garage door from well outside of sight range with the regular remote. I can set the wifi one to have even less range by requiring me to be on the same wifi network. There is very little downside to this for my use case.

The standards that require MyQ to make earsplitting noises for seconds before moving just cause headaches.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#98
post #81

I'm not going to point out the big things wrong with this project, because someone might think "oh, if I just fix those things I'm good". I will say I think it's the worst garage door opener project I've seen on hackernews yet. Nothing wrong with messing around with motors in the workshop but the author of this one should keep his project away from other human beings. Probably pets too. Here's the CPSC page on garage…

> No, you will not accidentally meet real-world safety standards with your project by dint of your sterling virtue, high intelligence, wisdom in the ways of the world, and impeccable engineering skills. Nor will you do so by adding a couple more features. Safety is the result of deliberate processes. This is unnecessary condescending snark that I hope we see less of on HN. Everyone should be open to criticism, but ho…

Indeed... the voting patterns in this thread are amazingly disappointing to me. This is hacker news not discourage and insult you for your mistakes news.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they use IR remotes, I imagine you could plug in a network connected Pi with a USB IR blaster next to each AC unit. Then stick the IR emitter LED on the little window where the IR receiver is on the AC unit. Then it's just a matter of capturing the remote codes and setting up a way to remotely command a given Pi to send that pattern of pulses out of its IR emitter. edit: I just did a quick search and Sparkfun sell…

I can't speak to the quality of this yet, but I just bought https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B016D5L5KE/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b... kit to dork around with myself. It comes with an IR transmitter and a whole host of other stuff to play with. That said, I do love adafruit and sparkfun for most purchases. My bank account doesn't, but I certainly do.

Oh, nice! I hadn't thought to look for multi-part kits like that but the next time I am looking for a sensor or emitter or whatever, I might check some of these kits if only because "more stuff!!"

I am the same with Adafruit et al. Their stuff is tested, easier to exchange/return if broken, often ship quickly since it's domestic to the US, etc. But when I need a bunch of something I tend to order more direct/bulk. My early LED strip projects were fine with a meter or two of "Neopixels" but when I wanted many many meters for bigger stuff, it was time to order reels from Ali Express. Shipping was slower, but even if I paid an extra $20 for fast shipping, it was much, much less than ordering from Adafruit. I just had to be aware that some of this stuff may not work and returning will be next to impossible. Luckily I had no issues.

Re: Show HN: Raspberry Pi garage door opener

#100

I'm not going to point out the big things wrong with this project, because someone might think "oh, if I just fix those things I'm good". I will say I think it's the worst garage door opener project I've seen on hackernews yet. Nothing wrong with messing around with motors in the workshop but the author of this one should keep his project away from other human beings. Probably pets too. Here's the CPSC page on garage…

I started to think I was a luddite to keep a several decade old remote in my car for wireless garage door control.
Post reply on HN