Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but your comments sound like "we have a proof of concept that this issue could be solved, therefore it is solved". What? No. This is about more people showing up to a foreclosure auction because they heard about the guy that bid $0 by being the only person at the foreclosure auction, and flipped a property for $4mm. And then you have an actual market. The auction house itself doesn't need to be patched. The auction…
I just feel like it's a typical libertarian comment that markets solve things because they will probably react eventually . It's not wrong to expect the feedback, but in the meantime, havoc that affects people occurs. That legitimately can affect peoples' opinion of a process.
If the auction didn't happen, then there would be a software problem to fix and a criticism of trusting MakerDao and "decentralized finance" smart contracts. If the auction did happen, and only 1 person showed up and bid as low as possible, there isn't a problem.
I was on the MakerDao video conference, and people suggested software tweaks such as a minimum, and people pointed out that it wouldn't make much of a difference for the person that got liquidated and if the market actually was moving faster (like it was at the time) an arbitrary - but software hardcoded - minimum would have disrupted the auction anyway.
The only thing that happened here is nobody showed up to the auction. Now you and thousands of other people know that there is an opportunity to be the only one at a auction, and non-existing UI prevents a crowd from being notified and showing up. And yet, if you want the opportunity to make millions, you'll figure it out, and so will other people, and you will start to outbid each other.