Live data from Hacker News

Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

moki.tv

91–98 of 98 posts

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The man who learned better.

How so? Seems to me it's just "the man who kicked lots of ass". He certainly didn't learn better, since John McClane proceeded to find himself in similar situations 3 more times :P

Only if you are referring to John McClane. "The man who learned better" could be Alan Rickman and all the other villains whose ass he kicked.

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#92
A bit over 25 years ago, I saw _Top Gun_ and told my girlfriend that people had forgotten how to make movies, though they did know how to make commercials and music videos. I don't think that I was wrong, but I may have implicitly given too much credit to the movie makers of years past.There were a lot of awful movies made during times that at least the film critics look back on with nostalgia.

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#93
post #35
post #32

Huge Moki.TV fan ( http://moki.tv/2481 ). But also a huge movie fan. I entirely disagree. Think about this years movies: The Social Network The Kings Speech Inception Black Swan True Grit Will all almost certainly become classics.

Don't you feel this might be kind of a cognitive bias? Like when people poll for the best album of all time and it's always something that was released within the last 3 years of whenever the poll was. The social network is of it's time and will date really badly, to the point where no one will watch or mention it ever again. True Grit is a remake so specifically cannot be included as it had to be good enough to have…

The social network is of it's time and will date really badly, to the point where no one will watch or mention it ever again.

I totally agree that The social network is of it's time but totally disagree that will date really badly.

The social network is about its time, and has excellent structure and dialog too. Time will tell if it becomes a classic, but as a snapshot of .dot com boom era it's excellent, and will remain so. How can one write a social history of the years 2000-2010 without mentioning social networks and facebook in particular?

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#94
OT: that website is horrible in Firefox, 100+ assets, 25 secs to the onload event, and afterwards it locks up periodically because of the chartbeat analytics ajax call. In Chrome, it's a breeze, fast load and then completely fluid. Chrome is magic.

PS: the Firefox UI freeze on ajax calls seems to be a Mac specific problem.

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#95
post #94

OT: that website is horrible in Firefox, 100+ assets, 25 secs to the onload event, and afterwards it locks up periodically because of the chartbeat analytics ajax call. In Chrome, it's a breeze, fast load and then completely fluid. Chrome is magic. PS: the Firefox UI freeze on ajax calls seems to be a Mac specific problem.

In Firefox 4 or 3.6?

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The man who learned better.

How so? Seems to me it's just "the man who kicked lots of ass". He certainly didn't learn better, since John McClane proceeded to find himself in similar situations 3 more times :P

Watch the movie again and think really hard...

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#97
post #95
post #94

OT: that website is horrible in Firefox, 100+ assets, 25 secs to the onload event, and afterwards it locks up periodically because of the chartbeat analytics ajax call. In Chrome, it's a breeze, fast load and then completely fluid. Chrome is magic. PS: the Firefox UI freeze on ajax calls seems to be a Mac specific problem.

In Firefox 4 or 3.6?

3.6

Never tried 4. In benchmarks it's way faster than 3.6. Downloading it now.

Re: Visualization: Movies Are Getting Worse

#98

One explanation behind increasing polarization could be the internet. I would assume that there are more movie critics now, or at least critics are more visible. Thanks to sites like Rotten Tomatoes, even a local newspaper critic can have global reach. Due to this visibility, it's harder for critics to stand out. The easiest way to stand out is to be extreme or contrarian which would lead to more polarization.

Your point is a very important one that I was surprised to find was not expressed by other commenters. It convinced me of something that was bouncing around my head while reading the article and the comments before yours:

If, as everyone seems to agree, movies are becoming more 'safe', more 'lowest common denominator' on average, reviews should be becoming _less_ polarized in response, not more.

That the opposite is happening suggests that reviews are progressively carrying less and less 'truth' than they once did, and this is likely the case even when they may be in general agreement on a given film.

Post reply on HN