Live data from Hacker News

Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

stevepavlina.com

91–100 of 112 posts

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#91
post #25

Facebook or any other social network works on our egos. We all want to show off how witty we are and how happy we are.Thats why we always see only the happy side of a persons life on any social network. And thats the reason you see only a 'like' button on Facebook. Enable a 'dislike' button and you will see many more dropouts. Actually, we can try one more experiment. The next time we don't like something, we say 'di…

I already do: "I would dislike this if I could".

[deleted]

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#92
post #11

Don't see what the problem is? Why do you need to quit facebook? Even after reading all these arguments. I'm on facebook where I occasionally share a picture of my son or a picture from something I enjoy. I don't post often but this way my parents en grandparents can see my son growing up. Don't actually care if my 'friends' see this. When I'm on the toilet I sometimes take my iphone and check the FB stream. Check it…

It provides sort of a "first hit is free" experience when you're trying to ignore it. "Oh, I'll just check my wall really quickly," followed by "I'm going to check this person's wall, because that comment was interesting," followed by more. I don't have that problem. My problem is that I notice someone invited me to a party two months ago, and didn't bother to contact me via direct email -- something I actually check…

Turn on email notifications. In fact, they are on by default.

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#93
This is why Facebook needs to become your inbox, because it allows Facebook to better understand who you are interested in, and stay relevant.

I wonder why FB haven't asked for your web mail logon, and mined the emails to better understand who you already interact with.

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#95
post #20
post #11

Don't see what the problem is? Why do you need to quit facebook? Even after reading all these arguments. I'm on facebook where I occasionally share a picture of my son or a picture from something I enjoy. I don't post often but this way my parents en grandparents can see my son growing up. Don't actually care if my 'friends' see this. When I'm on the toilet I sometimes take my iphone and check the FB stream. Check it…

I can sympathize. EVERYONE is on Facebook, and it's dead simple to use. I almost solely use it to post pictures of & stories about the kids to relatives. It also allows me to keep in touch with geo distant relatives' lives without them having to write it out on a postcard. I don't know of anything else that is in the same galaxy of convenience. If Facebook didn't do this, I wouldn't ever have signed up for an account…

EVERYONE is on Facebook

No. Not everyone is on Facebook. Sure, it's useful, but it's not the be-all and end-all of communication, and it will not replace every other means of communication ever invented. Stop this nonsense.

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#97
post #11

Don't see what the problem is? Why do you need to quit facebook? Even after reading all these arguments. I'm on facebook where I occasionally share a picture of my son or a picture from something I enjoy. I don't post often but this way my parents en grandparents can see my son growing up. Don't actually care if my 'friends' see this. When I'm on the toilet I sometimes take my iphone and check the FB stream. Check it…

I'm really interested in the difference between your perspective (which I share) and the perspective of Mr Pavlina (which my friends share). I see people's attitudes towards FB fall into these two distinct camps: 1) People who feel compelled by FB somehow, and end up deleting their profiles or "Quitting" entirely, and 2) People who have a profile, but don't feel compelled to check it or interact- except at their leis…

"Ignoring a text or phone call sends a message."

No it doesn't.

At least no for me. If I ignore a call or text, I was busy. If its important, s/he'll call again. If I forget to call back later, I forgot it. No drama.

Or maybe its just this kind of acting that makes the drama people stop contacting me. Sort of natural selection. Works pretty well.

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#98

I don't know why more people don't use the "hide" feature. I was rapidly becoming sick of Facebook. I only friended people that I'd met before, but even so it was polluted by people who I went to middle school, etc. with who I really didn't know that well even then. Then I found the "Hide" option. I hide probably 95% of my "friends." After I did this, I LOVED using Facebook again. Every time I logged in, I was able t…

I tried doing the "Hide" thing for a while, but there are two problems: 1) It's a pain in the ass to hunt down and hide various people and apps, and you have to keep up with it. Consequently, your friends who are likely to say interesting things but not spend a ton of time tweaking their FB settings tend to drift off, driving your signal down. 2) Hiding people is a blunt instrument -- you hide someone who's 98% noisy…

Making use of EdgeRank gives me more control than just hiding people.

Whenever I'd like to see more of somebody, I go to their page, make a couple of comments, and pronto, their posts enter my stream, squeezing out posts of people I didn't interact with. Problem solved.

Re: Steve Pavlina: 30 days since I quit Facebook

#99
Wow! I feel my stance on this has just been dramatically confirmed. Some years ago, I wrote a rant ( http://everything2.com/title/Facebook+destroys+real+relation... ) for the purpose of having a fixed thing to send people who would ask me why I'm not on Facebook. I got tired of explaining it over and over, so I wrote this. I got both positive and negative responses to it, and they fit a very definite pattern. The positive responses were always short and in the line of "this is exactly how I feel about this, glad I'm not alone". The negative responses were variations of "you've never tried it, so you can't possibly know what it's like", with optional "take your uninformed opinion elsewhere".

Now, Steve, as someone who has actually used the site for a nontrivial amount of time, writes a post bringing up mostly the same points. That feels nice.

Post reply on HN