Live data from Hacker News

In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

nicklevine.org

91–100 of 130 posts

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#91
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh really, that's interesting. Is that sort of info widely known among the HN user base and I'm an ignoramus or is it a case of some of the users of longer standing being vocal about Lisp?

No no it's not just you. I get this kind of thing from the HN community now and then too. I once got chewed out for not knowing who Paul Graham is.

This might catch you up a little bit :-) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=60357

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#92
post #87
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are people coming from nontraditional backgrounds into technical roles, and they, I assert, probably want a different book than the types of books O'Reilly generally publishes. ... and "the for Dummies" does not cater to them ? Or are you saying that O'Reilly should become somewhat more like the "Dummies" Series. Regardless of the name some of those books dont speak to the reader as if the reader is a dummy.…

I hate the dummies books too. People that consider themselves intelligent don't want to buy a book that forces you to call yourself a dummy. I'm saying there is another space for people that feel they are intelligent and don't yet have the knowledge about programming and could do it given the right introductions. O'Reilly speaks to me too, but I think there is entire population of people that aren't familiar with Tim…

Oh I did not mean to say I hate the Dummies series. I had picked one up, something on personal finance if I remember correctly. I was quite pleasantly surprised that the author did not speak to me as if I am a dummy.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#93
post #53
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh really, that's interesting. Is that sort of info widely known among the HN user base and I'm an ignoramus or is it a case of some of the users of longer standing being vocal about Lisp?

> Is that sort of info widely known among the HN user base Paul Graham's essays are widely known among the HN user base, especially the "Beating the Averages" [1] one. Some of those who've read it know a bit more about the deeper history. And others obsessed with the "10x programmer" myth and they randomly stumble upon Lisp as one of the many "magic oils" that are rumored to make one into such a mythical creature. It…

> ...but it's probably not a good tool to use unless your problem requires you to invent a new programming language

I'm curious why you say this.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#94
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh really, that's interesting. Is that sort of info widely known among the HN user base and I'm an ignoramus or is it a case of some of the users of longer standing being vocal about Lisp?

No no it's not just you. I get this kind of thing from the HN community now and then too. I once got chewed out for not knowing who Paul Graham is.

You'd probably get chewed out on Facebook for not knowing who is Mark Zuckerberg.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#95
post #92
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate the dummies books too. People that consider themselves intelligent don't want to buy a book that forces you to call yourself a dummy. I'm saying there is another space for people that feel they are intelligent and don't yet have the knowledge about programming and could do it given the right introductions. O'Reilly speaks to me too, but I think there is entire population of people that aren't familiar with Tim…

Oh I did not mean to say I hate the Dummies series. I had picked one up, something on personal finance if I remember correctly. I was quite pleasantly surprised that the author did not speak to me as if I am a dummy.

That's my experience with them as well. But, I've resisted looking at them even knowing that because I resisted calling myself a dummy. They are huge sellers, so I'm in the no minority with that opinion obviously.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#96
post #90
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate the dummies books too. People that consider themselves intelligent don't want to buy a book that forces you to call yourself a dummy. I'm saying there is another space for people that feel they are intelligent and don't yet have the knowledge about programming and could do it given the right introductions. O'Reilly speaks to me too, but I think there is entire population of people that aren't familiar with Tim…

I think you're right about this. I'd much rather read LISP for Poets or LISP for Future Presidents than something with a title that is insulting or degrading. There's probably a considerable market for books that educate and respect the reader.

That's a great theme. Programmers have a different set of aspirations than most people, so making books that speak to both a different aspiration and teach tech seems like a winner of an idea for the rest of the people out there who don't identify as a nerd.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#98
post #13

Why is HN this interested in Lisp anyway? Not saying it's a good or bad language, just don't quite get why it receives as much attention as it does.

Lisp is an interesting programming language. Some have strong opinions that it's a good one as well. I personally think it deserves more attention than it gets and the more mainstream languages usually get more attention than they deserve (like Go for example).

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lisp was a lot less web friendly then than it is now, especially compared to those languages.

When Alexis Ohanian gave a talk at Google in 2013 I asked him afterwards about converting Reddit from Common Lisp to Python. He said the Common Lisp version crashed too often. He even made a funny comment about this when he autographed Without Their Permission for me. I agree with you, the web apps in CL story is much better now. I am biased, now that I am mostly retired most of my fun side projects are in CL (with H…

Do you know of any good setup for type-aware autocompletion of Haskell? There are some language servers for it, but it's difficult to get them to play nicely in the face of updates and such.

I hope such an editing system could offset the power of AST macros due to the possible ease of discovery.

Macros unfortunately require a very skilled developer team to not cause mayhem, taken to the extreme in Go not offering any fancy typing or macros.

Re: In May 2009 O'Reilly agreed to publish a book about Common Lisp (2011)

#100

[2011].

Why do people tag the year on articles? I feel like hackers cling to the “if it’s not new, it’s not worthy” paradigm. Update: Thanks for all the replies, makes sense. Why downvote an honest question?

To your question re: why the downvotes (I wasn't one of them): it was an honest, but not very good, question. You essentially misunderstood the main focus of this site (Hacker News[1]) and asked, in a way that likely came across as pejorative (i.e. 'cling'), 'why are people so interested in the news at this news discussion site?'

[1]https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/news

Post reply on HN