Live data from Hacker News

YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

blog.ycombinator.com

91–100 of 226 posts

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#91
A startup working on a secure digital voting system should be one of the top priorities here. As it currently stands, this is what the voting experience is like:

- Always on a weekday, so if you have a job and then a family to take care of after work, good luck finding time.

- Long lines, so that even those who find time are discouraged by standing around in November weather.

- The countless cases of voting locations in minority areas conveniently having broken machines or other barriers that prevent them from voting.

This environment has essentially optimized the experience for one group: retirees who have the time and energy to prioritize their day around voting. It's no surprise that legislation often favors this specific group as a result.

My high-level vision of how digital voting would look:

- A secure open source app that verifies your identity before letting you vote.

- Every candidate on the ballot would have a bio detailing their policies and views, to be filled out by them.

- A digital approach would make it easier to eventually adapt the system to involve things like ranked voting.

This would allow everyone to vote whenever and wherever they want, no relying on external factors like those mentioned above. It also provides one consistent place for every voter to see the same information about the candidates, rather than placing that task in the hands of media and their inherent bias/interests.

That's my 2 cents, I'm excited to see how startups tackle this.

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#92

Note that none of those startups are currently tackling stagnant wages directly, which is really what would fix a lot of the other problems listed here. I've worked for a company that paid millions for a contract and software that ultimately wasn't used. There was tons of corporate waste that could be solved by simple internal CRUD apps and a little user training, purchases that weren't used much (if at all), project…

More to the point, how do you address an issue with hundreds of contributory causes? It's so large as to be effectively intractable. It's akin to trying to cure the common cold.

Of the issues you listed, dumbass purchases is by far the most tractable. It aligns with existing incentives. It's something companies are broadly already on board with. It might even be possible to contractually hook it in with departmental compensation to boost wages with part of the funds when waste is found.

Now that sounds a lot more workable than "tackling stagnant wages". Might just be me, though.

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#93
post #72
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why'd you name it Government 2.0, if you "do not seek to replace the government and its policymakers but seek to fund startups that create solutions that provide Americans the foundations for economic growth?" Did you consider any other less misleading/terrifying names?

YC didn't invent this term.

Good point. :)

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#94
post #89
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be sure I understand you clearly, are you making the claim that making sure people don't forget or lose track of court dates will help literally nobody avoid going to jail?

I'm not denying that it might help people, it just seems like a half-assed bandaid solution given the breadth of the problem.

If you have an idea for an app that will directly tackle poverty and hopelessness, I think there are a lot of people willing to listen.

This isn't an attempt to bandaid over the whole problem. It's an attempt to address a minor contributing factor that is much more tractable than hopelessness.

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#95
post #62
post #31

If anyone wants to help Veterans, I am an attorney, 5+ years in assisting Vets get VA benefits. I have A LOT of fully formed concepts, but amateur/hobby technical ability. Most immediate goal is to compliment but go well beyond the very minimal efforts that USDS has been doing for Vets directly the last 2-3 years. VA has coopted USDS into assisting the VA first, Vets only incidentally. matt@deutermanlaw.com

I'm surprised to hear about this. USDS is paraded around as one of the poster childs of how to pair tech with the public sector and effective government work. Are there any posts about how they failed with VA benefits?

I was actually considering writing one but I have no established presence or blog. I'm a full-time attorney but I've been following USDS work with VA for years now. I am subscribed to every update in certain respositories.

In very very short terms, the tools have been designed from scratch without primary stakeholders (veterans, their advocates) for 2-3 years and they are just now considering opening up to stakeholder issues on their github. Instead, they focus on VA employees say they need to accomplish their jobs or even VA contractors.

Certain VA employees have publicly stated ownership of the USDS's work on their behalf, it's "their" software and not the public's or Veterans', and it is clearly designed as such.

I could give very specific examples all throughout the USDS VA Digital Service github account but I'll just leave this nugget[0] (which I wrote) from October 2017. They just stated their intention to begin to incorporate stakeholder ideas only a few months ago[1].

What would actually improve Veteran's claims processing starts with what Veterans and their advocates can do - to SAVE government resources doing the same thing or codifying it into complicated software on their end.

[0]https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/caseflow-e...

[1]see very bottom of [0]

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#96
I don't see tech being a solution here. As a Canadian, this is one of the areas where Americans and Canadians differ very noticeably. The US seems to have a dogmatic / religious belief that government is bad, and that business / private enterprise is the answer to almost everything. Even among HN Silicon-Valley progressive types who are so similar to me, there's a difference in mind-set. It's like it's in your milk, air, and water growing up.

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#97
post #91

A startup working on a secure digital voting system should be one of the top priorities here. As it currently stands, this is what the voting experience is like: - Always on a weekday, so if you have a job and then a family to take care of after work, good luck finding time. - Long lines, so that even those who find time are discouraged by standing around in November weather. - The countless cases of voting locations…

See https://voting.works

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#98

The irony when they talk about affordable housing but don't say a word about AirBnb which is fucking over long term renters in popular tourist destinations.

What about the hosts who use Airbnb to help them pay their rent?

Ah yes, think of the poor high-rise owners who won't take on long-term tenants because they make more from tourists. How else would they afford their vacation home

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#99
post #85
post #28

The solution to income inequality is not going to come from venture capitalists and private companies. I have an idea for a non-profit that tackles a systemic problem, but I can't help but look at some of the other yc grads and think that their companies seem hopelessly out of touch with the problems they're trying to tackle. Promise is mentioned as "tackling mass incarceration", but their company seems geared more t…

You're absolutely correct that good approaches to social problems (don't want to use the term "solution" which is ill-suited, I think) will not come from VCs: It will come from naive entrepreneurs, naive in the sense that they don't quite appreciate the problem they are tackling, because if they do they would never take it on. A simple fact I learned in volunteering that's applicable here, too, is that in tackling th…

Great reply! We don't expect to be the source of solutions. We just want to help founders who are brave enough to take these challenges on.

Re: YC's request for startups: Government 2.0

#100
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be sure I understand you clearly, are you making the claim that making sure people don't forget or lose track of court dates will help literally nobody avoid going to jail?

Of course not. The claim is that even though it might help people, it does nothing to fix the systemic issue, which is that we jail way too many people. The U.S. has less than 5% of the world's people, but almost 25% of the world's prison population [1]. The question is what happens when we try to radically reduce the number of people we send to prison. Is there still space for Promise to make the new justice system…

I don't need exposition, though I'm sure some other reader will appreciate the links and numbers.

I've always found that the big problem with insisting on go-big-or-go-home approaches to problems is that the odds are very good that you wind up landing on go home.

It might just be me - and I'm typing this while blearly-eyed tired - but it seems like insisting that systemic change is the only acceptable approach is a good way to make shockingly little progress. You wind up losing those all-or-nothing bets too often.

If the company helps some people and fails as a company, I'm going to call that a victory for humanity. I understand that some might choose to avoid a potential way to improve some lives out of a fear that it could backfire in some possible futures. I don't know what to say except that I disagree with that weighting of probabilities.

Post reply on HN